Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 5844 Kant
Judgement Date : 22 August, 2023
-1-
NC: 2023:KHC:29870
RSA No. 1359 of 2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF AUGUST, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 1359 OF 2017
BETWEEN:
K.S. LAKSHMEESHA
S/O SUBRAMANYA
AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS,
EDITOR AND PUBLISHER OF
LAKSHMEESHA PATHRIKE
R/O CAR STREET
THIRTHAHALLI-577432
SHIMOGA DISTRICT.
... APPELLANT
(BY SRI PRASAD B.S., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. P.SHANKARA PRABHU
Digitally signed D/O H. NARAYANA PRABHU,
by SHARANYA T AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS
Location: HIGH R/O D.NO.9, 4-75,
COURT OF
KARNATAKA KUDVAS COMPOUND
OPP. KEB OFFICE
UDUPI-576101.
...RESPONDENT
THIS R.S.A IS FILED UNDER SEC.100 OF CPC., AGAINST
THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 25.3.2017 PASSED IN
R.A. NO.97/2013 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
AND JMFC, SAGAR, DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND
CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 31.07.2013
PASSED IN O.S.NO.68/1999 AND OS NO.51/2002 ON THE FILE
OF THE CIVIL JUDGE, HOSANAGARA.
-2-
NC: 2023:KHC:29870
RSA No. 1359 of 2017
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE
COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
This appeal was filed in the year 2017. Thereafter, the
matter was listed before the Court on 17.12.2019 and on that
day none appears before the Court. However in the ends of the
justice the Court has granted the time and the matter again
listed on 23.10.2021, once again a week's time was granted
and even on that day also the counsel for appellant has not
complied with the office objections. Once again the matter was
listed on 19.07.2022, on that day also the office objections are
not complied by the counsel for appellant, the matter was again
listed on 14.12.2022, again the counsel for appellant seeks
time to comply with office objections. hence, two weeks time
was granted to the counsel but, he has not complied the same.
2. When the matter listed before this Court on
11.04.2023, this Court taking into note of the appeal is of the
year 2017, however in the ends of the justice another 10 days
time was granted to comply with office objections and to pay
the cost of Rs.1,000/- and also made it clear that, if cost is not
NC: 2023:KHC:29870 RSA No. 1359 of 2017
paid and if office objections are not complied within 10 days,
list the matter for dismissal on 21.04.2023. But, on
21.04.2023, the counsel for appellant was made the submission
that he has paid the deficit court fee and one more office
objection is pending and same has to be clarified within two
weeks.
3. In spite of sufficient time was given, the counsel
for appellant has not produced the cost paid receipt for having
paid the cost and also not complied with the office objections.
The counsel for appellant has not complied with the office
objections since from 2017 to 2023.
4. Hence, the appeal is dismissed for non compliance
of office objections and also non payment of the cost.
Sd/-
JUDGE
RHS
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!