Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 5713 Kant
Judgement Date : 17 August, 2023
-1-
NC: 2023:KHC:29195
RSA No. 828 of 2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 828 OF 2017 (DEC/INJ)
BETWEEN:
1. K.C. RATHNAMMA
D/O LATE CHIKKARANGAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS,
R/AT KADAVIGERE VILLAGE,
KALLAMBELLA HOBLI,
SIRA TALUK-572 137,
TUMKUR DISTRICT.
2. K.C. PADDAMMA
D/O. LATE CHIKKARANGAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS,
R/AT KADAVIGERE VILLAGE,
KALLAMBELLA HOBLI,
Digitally signed
by SHARANYA T SIRA TALUK-572 137,
Location: HIGH TUMKUR DISTRICT.
COURT OF
KARNATAKA 3. K.C. VEDAVATHAMMA
D/O. LATE CHIKKARANGAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS,
R/AT KADAVIGERE VILLAGE,
KALLAMBELLA HOBLI,
SIRA TALUK-572 137,
TUMKUR DISTRICT.
4. K.C. RUKMINI
D/O. LATE CHIKKARANGAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS,
R/AT KADAVIGERE VILLAGE,
-2-
NC: 2023:KHC:29195
RSA No. 828 of 2017
KALLAMBELLA HOBLI,
SIRA TALUK-572 137,
TUMKUR DISTRICT.
...APPELLANTS
(BY SRI KAMARAAJU &
SRI S. YOGENDRA, ADVOCATES [ABSENT])
AND:
1. K.P. VIJAYAKUMAR
S/O. PUTTASHAMANNA,
AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS,
R/AT NO.63,
SREE MANJUNATHA PRASANNA,
SREE BALAKRISHNA NILAYA,
2ND MAIN, 2ND CROSS,
T.P. KAILASAM ROAD,
SAPTHAGIRI EXTENTION,
TUMKUR-572 105.
...RESPONDENT
THIS RSA IS FILED U/S. 100 OF CPC 1908, AGAINST THE
JUDGEMENT & DECREE DTD: 07.01.2017 PASSED IN
R.A.NO.179/2016 ON THE FILE OF THE VI ADDL. DISTRICT
AND SESSIONS JUDGE, TUMAKURU., DISMISSING THE APPEAL
AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGEMENT AND DECREE DTD
13.04.2016 PASSED IN OS.NO.4/2013 ON THE FILE OF THE
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SIRA.
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY,
THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
This matter is of the year 2017 and counsel in the previous
occasion on 3.8.2023 was also absent and this Court taking
note of no representation for the appellants through out made
an observation that, appellants counsel not pursuing the matter
NC: 2023:KHC:29195 RSA No. 828 of 2017
diligently. However, in the ends of justice, one more
opportunity was given and also made it clear that, if counsel for
the appellants does not appear on the next date of hearing, the
appeal will be dismissed for non-prosecution.
2. In spite of it, for a period of six years matter has not
been pursued by the appellants counsel and hence, appeal is
dismissed for non prosecution, in view of the peremptory order
dated 3.8.2023.
Sd/-
JUDGE
AP
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!