Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 5417 Kant
Judgement Date : 8 August, 2023
-1-
NC: 2023:KHC:27912
RSA No. 357 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 357 OF 2023 (POS)
BETWEEN:
1. M. VASANTHA NAYAK
S/O RAMANATHA NAYAK
AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS,
R/AT H.SEETHARAMA BHAT COMPOUND
COURT ROAD, PUTTUR POST,
PUTTUR, D.K. - 574 201.
...APPELLANT
(BY SRI M.J.ALVA, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. M. SRINIVASA NAYAK
S/O RAMANATHA NAYK
AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS,
R/AT H.SEETHARAMA BHAT COMPOUND
Digitally signed
COURT ROAD, PUTTUR POST,
by SHARANYA T PUTTUR, D.K. - 574 201.
Location: HIGH ...RESPONDENT
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
(BY SRI CHANDRANATH ARIGA K., ADVOCATE FOR C/R)
THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 06.12.2022
PASSED IN R.A.NO.11/2021 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, PUTTUR, TALUK, D.K.
DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT
AND DECREE DATED 15.03.2021 PASSED IN O.S.NO.191/2010
ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,
PUTTUR, D.K.
-2-
NC: 2023:KHC:27912
RSA No. 357 of 2023
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY,
THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Heard the appellant's counsel and also the counsel
appearing for the respondent.
2. The respondent counsel in the previous occasion made
the submission that in view of the judgment and decree of the
Trial Court and also decree of the First Appellate Court
possession is taken and to that effect memo is also filed. The
counsel for the appellant would submit that the finding given by
the Trial Court as well as the First Appellate Court should not
come in the way in disposal of the suit which is filed for the
relief of partition. Both the counsels not disputes the fact that
suit is pending for the relief of partition before the Trial Court.
When such being the circumstances and also counsel appearing
for the appellant relies upon the judgment ILR 2014 KAR
1444 regarding nomenclature of the document cannot be
looked into, contents of the documents are paramount, and
though the document is styled as settlement deed and recital of
the documents is nothing but a gift deed and no acceptance.
NC: 2023:KHC:27912 RSA No. 357 of 2023
3. The said contention is kept open and the parties can
raise all grounds which have been urged before the Trial Court
as well as the First Appellate Court and while the Trial Court
disposing the matter for suit for partition shall not influence
with the findings of the Trial Court as well as the First Appellate
Court with regard to seeking the relief of partition and only an
order has been passed for delivery of possession and decree
already been executed by taking the possession in terms of the
memo filed before this Court.
4. With these observations, the second appeal is disposed
of.
All contentions are kept open to the parties to raise the
same in a partition suit.
Sd/-
JUDGE
AP
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!