Friday, 08, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

T S Suresh vs State By Koppa Police Station
2023 Latest Caselaw 2315 Kant

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 2315 Kant
Judgement Date : 21 April, 2023

Karnataka High Court
T S Suresh vs State By Koppa Police Station on 21 April, 2023
Bench: Mohammad Nawaz
                                           -1-
                                                  CRL.A No. 530 of 2023




                    IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

                        DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF APRIL, 2023

                                        BEFORE
                      THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE MOHAMMAD NAWAZ
                           CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 530 OF 2023
                                           C/W
                           CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 529 OF 2023



               IN CRL.A. NO.530 OF 2023
               BETWEEN:

               1.    T S SURESH
                     S/O SATHYANARAYANA
                     AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS
                     WORKING AT TAYOTA COMPANY
                     R/O 2ND MAIN, 6TH CROSS
Digitally            MES ROAD, MATHSYALA NAGARA
signed by            BENGALURU-560 054.
LAKSHMI T
                                                            ...APPELLANT
Location:
High Court
of Karnataka   (BY SRI. K V SATEESHCHANDRA, ADVOCATE)


               AND:

               1.    STATE BY KOPPA POLICE STATION
                     KOPPA TALUK, CHIKKAMAGALUR- 577 126.
                     REPRESENTED BY
                     STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
                     KARNATAKA HIGH COURT BUILDING
                     BANGALORE-560 001.

               2.    VENKATESH
                     S/O. GANESH,
                     AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS
                     R/O CHIKKANAGUNDI
                              -2-
                                   CRL.A No. 530 of 2023




     HORANDUR VILLAGE,
     KOPPA TALUK
     CHIKKAMAGALURU-577 126.

3.   SHREYAS V
     S/O VENKATESH
     AGED ABOUT 19 YEARS
     R/O CHIKKANAGUNDI
     HORANDUR VILLAGE
     KOPPA TALUK
     CHIKKAMAGALURU-577 126.
                                         ...RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI. K.NAGESHWARAPPA, HCGP FOR R1;
     R2 AND R3 ARE SERVED)


     THIS CRL.A. IS FILED U/S.14(A) (2) OF SC/ST (POA)
ACT, 2015 PRAYING TO A. SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER
PASSED BY THE COURT OF I ADDITIONAL SESSIONS AND
SPECIAL       JUDGE,       AT      CHIKKAMAGALURU    IN
CRL.MISC.NO.10/2023 DATED 23.02.2023. B. ALLOW THE
ABOVE CRIMINAL APPEAL BY ENLARGING THE APPELLANTS
(ACCUSED NO.1) ON BAIL AND DIRECT THE RESPONDENT
POLICE (KOPPA POLICE) TO RELEASE THE APPELLANTS ON
BAIL, IN THE EVENT OF HIS ARREST IN CR.NO.10/2023 FOR
THE OFFENCE P/U/S.447,324,307,504 R/W SEC.34 OF IPC AND
SEC.3(1)(r)(s), 3(2)(va) OF SC/ST (POA) ACT.


IN CRL.A. NO.529 OF 2023
BETWEEN:

1.   ANITHA R
     W/O SURESH T S,
     AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS,

2.   SUSHEELAMMA,
     W/O LATE T M SATYANARAYANA,
     AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS,
                              -3-
                                   CRL.A No. 530 of 2023




     BOTH ARE RESIDING AT #373,
     2ND A MAIN, 6TH CROSS, M E S ROAD,
     MUTYALAYA NAGARA,
     BENGALURU - 560 054.
                                           ...APPELLANTS
(BY SRI. K V SATEESHCHANDRA, ADVOCATE)

AND:

1.   STATE BY KOPPA POLICE STATION,
     KOPPA TALUK,
     CHIKKAMAGALURU - 577 126.
     REPRESENTED BY
     STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR.
     KARNATAKA HIGH COURT BUILDING
     BANGALORE - 560 001.

2.   VENKATESH,
     AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS,
     R/O CHIKKANAGUNDI,
     HORANDUR VILLAGE, KOPPA TALUK,
     CHIKKAMAGALURU - 577 126.

3.   SHREYAS V
     S/O VENKATESH,
     AGED ABOUT 19 YEARS,
     R/O CHIKKANAGUDNI,
     HORANDUR VILLAGE, KOPPA TALUK,
     CHIKKAMAGALURU - 577 126.
                                          ...RESPONDENTS


(BY SRI. K.NAGESHWARAPPA, HCGP FOR R1;
     R2 AND R3 ARE SERVED)
                                  -4-
                                          CRL.A No. 530 of 2023




     THIS CRL.A. IS FILED U/S.14(A) (2) OF SC/ST (POA)
ACT, 2015 PRAYING TO A. SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER
PASSED BY THE COURT OF I ADDITIONAL SESSIONS AND
SPECIAL      JUDGE,         AT         CHIKKAMAGALURU        IN
CRL.MISC.NO.102/2023 DATED 23.02.2023. B. ALLOW THE
ABOVE CRIMINAL APPEAL BY ENLARING THE APPELLANTS ON
ANTICIPATORY BAIL AND DIRECT THE RESPONDENT POLICE
(KOPPA POLICE) TO RELEASE THE APPELLANTS ON BAIL, IN
THE EVENT OF HIS ARREST IN CR.NO.10/2023 FOR THE
OFFENCE P/U/S.447,324,307,504 R/W SEC.34 OF IPC AND
SEC.3(1)(r)(s), 3(2)(va) OF SC/ST (POA) ACT.



     THESE APPEALS ARE COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS
DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:


                        JUDGMENT

Criminal Appeal No.530/2023 is preferred by accused

No.1 and criminal appeal No.529/2023 is preferred by

accused Nos.3 and 4 respectively.

2. Heard the learned counsel for appellants and

learned High Court Government Pleader for

respondent/State and perused the material on record.

CRL.A No. 530 of 2023

3. The appellants are accused in Crime

No.10/2023 of Koppa Police Station registered for offences

punishable under Sections 447, 324, 307, 504 r/w 34 of

IPC and Section 3(1)(r)(s), (2)(va) of the SC/ST (POA)

Amendment Act, 2015.

4. A perusal of the complaint lodged by one

Shreyas V. would reveal that his father by name

Venkatesh was assaulted on his head etc., when he had

gone to his land on 29.01.2023 at about 4.30 p.m. and

this was informed to the first informant by one Sandeep.

Immediately the first informant went to the hospital and

on enquiry, his father informed him that while working in

the land, accused No.1, his son i.e., accused No.2, wife

and mother of accused No.1 came in a Innova Car bearing

Registration No.KA-53-P-2133 and abused him referring to

his caste as 'Holeya Sule Magane' and then accused No.2

with an intention to commit his murder wielded a chopper

on account of which he sustained severe injuries on his

head and accused No.1 tried to assault him with a rod

CRL.A No. 530 of 2023

and when he tried to evade the said blow, he sustained

injuries to his left hand. One Ramachandra and his son

came and pacified the quarrel and shifted the injured to

the hospital.

5. The learned counsel for appellants would

contend that on account of a land dispute, a false case has

been foisted against accused No.1 and his family

members. He would draw the attention of the Court to a

private complaint in PCR No.189/2021 filed by accused

No.4 against the injured for an offence punishable under

Section 138 of N.I. Act, a criminal complaint lodged by

accused No.3 against the injured and another which was

registered in crime No.1/2023 of Koppa Police Station for

an offence punishable under Section 379 of IPC, another

criminal case registered in crime No.11/2023 of Koppa

Police Station on a complaint lodged by accused No.3

against the injured and another for offences punishable

Sections 506, 341 and 354 of IPC. It is also contended

that since the appellants herein were facing threat from

CRL.A No. 530 of 2023

complainant's party, couple of representations were also

given to the DG and IGP by accused No.1. It is therefore

contended that on account of previous enmity, appellants

are implicated in a false case.

6. Learned counsel would also contend that the

injured has been discharged from the hospital and there

are no criminal antecedents against the appellants. He

submits that accused No.1 is in custody for more than 90

days. He contends that even accepting the allegations in

the FIR, the ingredients of the offences under the SC/ST

Act are not made out. Therefore seeks to enlarge the

appellants on bail by imposing any conditions.

7. The learned High Court Government Pleader

has opposed the prayer contending that the injured has

sustained grievous injuries and both accused Nos.1 and 2

with a common intention have attempted on the life of the

injured. He contends that in view of the specific allegations

against accused Nos.3 and 4 that they have abused the

injured with filthy language referring to his caste, they are

CRL.A No. 530 of 2023

not entitled for the relief of anticipatory bail. He contends

that the learned Sessions Judge having appreciated the

material on record has rightly rejected the prayer of the

appellants and therefore seeks to dismiss the appeals.

8. Accused No.1 preferred a petition under Section

439 of Cr.P.C and Accused Nos.3 and 4 preferred a

petition under Section 438 Cr.P.C before the learned

Sessions Judge. Both the said petitions came to be

dismissed. Hence, they have preferred the above appeals.

9. The FIR is registered against accused Nos.1 to

4. A perusal of the complaint averments goes to show

that when the injured Venkatesh was working in the land,

all the accused came in a car and abused him in filthy

language referring to his caste as 'holeya sule magane'

and questioned him as to why he has come to the land.

The abusive words used against the injured insulting his

caste is concerned, an omnibus allegations are made that

all the four accused have abused him. It is not specifically

stated as to which of the accused used the abusive words.

CRL.A No. 530 of 2023

The allegations in that regard is vague. Even otherwise,

admittedly the incident has taken place when the injured

had gone to his land and it appears that there is a land

dispute between the parties. It is not the case of

prosecution that the injured was abused only on the

ground that he belongs to scheduled caste or scheduled

tribe. It is also submitted by the learned counsel for

appellants that in so far as accused No.4 is concerned the

provisions under the SC/ST Act has been dropped while

filing the charge-sheet.

10. In so far as the appeal preferred by accused

No.1 is concerned, the allegations are that he tried to

assault the injured with a rod and in the process the

injured sustained injuries to his left hand. The overt acts

of assaulting the injured on his head is attributed against

accused No.2. As per the wound certificate/discharge

summary the injured has sustained wound over the

forehead measuring 4/4 cm and swelling over the wrist.

The injuries are stated to be grievous in nature. The

- 10 -

CRL.A No. 530 of 2023

injuries sustained on the forehead is attributed to the

assault made by accused No.2. Further, a perusal of the

FIR in Crime No.11/2023 of Koppa Police Station goes to

show that on the same day i.e., on 29.01.2023 even

accused No.3 lodged a complaint against the injured and

one Ramachandra for offences punishable under Sections

506, 341 and 354 of IPC in respect of an incident which

took place at about 3.30 p.m.

11. Accused No.1 was arrested on 30.01.2023. He

is in custody for more than three months. It is submitted

that investigation is completed and charge-sheet has been

filed. For the foregoing reasons, the appeals filed by

accused Nos.1, 3 and 4 can be allowed, by imposing

necessary conditions. Accordingly, the following:

ORDER

Criminal Appeal No.530/2023 is allowed.

- 11 -

CRL.A No. 530 of 2023

Appellant/accused No.1 in Crime No.10/2023 of

Koppa Police Station shall be enlarged on bail subject to

following conditions:

i. He shall execute a bond in a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lakh only) with two sureties for the likesum to the satisfaction of the Jurisdictional Court.

ii. He shall furnish proof of his residential address and shall inform the Court if there is any change in the address.

iii. He shall not tamper with the prosecution witnesses either directly or indirectly.

     iv.    He       shall    cooperate          with    the
            investigation of the case.

     v.     He shall not involve in any criminal
            activities.


     vi.    He shall be regular in attending the
            Court proceedings.
                                - 12 -
                                            CRL.A No. 530 of 2023




Criminal Appeal No.529/2023 is allowed.

Appellants/accused Nos.3 and 4 shall be released in

the event of their arrest in Crime No.10/2023 of Koppa

Police Station subject to following conditions:

i. They shall appear before the Investigation Officer within a period of one week from the date of receipt of a copy of the order and shall execute a bond in a sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) each with one surety for the likesum.

ii. They shall furnish proof of their residential address and shall inform the Court if there is any change in the address.

iii. They shall not tamper with the prosecution witnesses either directly or indirectly.

     iv.    They shall cooperate with the              further
            investigation    of    the    case,     if   any,
                             - 13 -
                                     CRL.A No. 530 of 2023




            whenever they are called upon to do
            so.

      v.    They shall be regular in attending the
            Court proceedings.




                                      Sd/-
                                     JUDGE



HB

 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter