Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 2170 Kant
Judgement Date : 11 April, 2023
-1-
CRL.P No. 2883 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF APRIL, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K.NATARAJAN
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 2883 OF 2023
BETWEEN:
1. SRI. NARAYANACHAR
S/O CHANDRACHAR D
AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS
R/AT BEHIND GOVINDAPPA HOUSE
T B CIRCLE
HIRIYUR - 577 598
NOW AT,
SREE MATHA JEWELLERY
GANDHI CIRCLE
HIRIYUR - 577 598
2. SRI VIVEKANANDA N
S/O NARAYANACHAR C
AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS
R/AT BEHIND GOVINDAPPA HOUSE
T B CIRCLE
HIRIYUR - 577 598
Digitally signed by
BHAVANI BAI G NOW AT NO.3/2, 3RD FLOOR,
Location: High Court
of Karnataka THIMMIAH TOWERS,
GANDHINAGAR, 1ST CROSS,
BANGALORE 560009
...PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. RAJU C N.,ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY HIRIYUR TOWN POLICE STATION
REPRESENTED BY SPECIAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
HIGH COURT BUILDING
BENGALURU - 560 001
-2-
CRL.P No. 2883 of 2023
2. SRI DR KRISHNARAJ
S/O VENKATARAO
AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS,
R/AT DURGA CLINIC
MYSORE ROAD,
HIRIYUR - 577 598
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. B.J. ROHITH, HCGP FOR R1
NOTICE TO R2 IS DISPENSED WITH)
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 482 OF
CR.P.C. PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 19/02/2022 AT
ANNEXURE A TAKING COGNIZANCE OF THE OFFENCES PUNISHABLE
UNDER SECTIONS 323, 504, 506 AND 34 OF THE INDIAN PENAL
CODE, 1860 AND SECTIONS 3 AND 4 OF THE KARNATAKA
PROHIBITION OF VIOLENCE AGAINST MEDICARE SERVICE
PERSONNEL AND DAMAGE TO PROPERTY IN MEDICARE SERVICE
INSTITUTIONS ACT 2009 AGAINST THE PETITIONERS IN
C.C.279/2022 ON THE FILE OF PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE AND
JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE FIRST CLASS, HIRIYUR, CHITRADURGA
DISTRICT ARISING OUT OF CRIME NO.71/2021 OF HIRIYUR TOWN
POLICE STATION, CHITRADURGA DISTRICT, BY ALLOWING THIS
PETITION.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, THE
COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Learned High Court Government Pleader accepts notice
for the respondent No.1-State.
Issuance of notice to respondent No.2 is hereby
dispensed with.
This petition is filed by the petitioners-accused Nos.1 and
2 under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. for quashing the criminal
proceedings in C.C.No.279/2022 registered by Hiriyur Town
CRL.P No. 2883 of 2023
Police Station, Chitradurga and charge-sheeted for the offences
punishable under Sections 323, 504, 506 read with Section 34
of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Sections 3 and 4 of the
Karnataka Prohibition of Violence against Medicare Service
Personnel and Damage to Property in Medicare Service
Institutions Act, 2009 (for short 'Act').
2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and
learned High Court Government Pleader for the respondent
No.1-State.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that
petitioners took the mother of petitioner No.2 to the hospital
belong to the respondent No.2, where the respondent No.2 did
not taken care of the patient, therefore, there was a verbal
quarrel between them, hence, a false complaint has been filed,
which is under challenge.
4. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits the
offence is non cognizable offence. The informant not
approached the permission of the Magistrate and the trial Court
also not properly applied the mind while permitting the police
CRL.P No. 2883 of 2023
to investigate the matter. There is violation of Section 155 of
Cr.P.C. Hence, prayed for quashing the same.
5. Per contra, learned High Court Government Pleader
objected the same and contended that the trial Court has
applied the mind and permitted the police to investigate the
matter. Hence, prayed for dismissing the petition.
6. Having heard the arguments and on perusal of the
records, which reveals, of course, the alleged offence is non
cognizable offence, where as per the judgment of this Court in
the case of Vaggeppa Gurulinga Jangaligi (Jangalagi) vs.
The State of Karnataka, Through PSI, Kagwad Police
Station, Belagavi reported in ILR 2020 KAR 630, the
informant shall approach the Magistrate and obtain the
permission under Section 155(2) of Cr.P.C., where the Police
though received the complaint and registered NCR but the
constable went to the Magistrate and obtained the permission
but not by the informant. Therefore, there is a gross violation
of provision under Sections 155(1) and 155(2) of Cr.P.C. The
trial Court also not applied mind and permitted to register the
FIR without mentioning the gist of the complaint by opening the
CRL.P No. 2883 of 2023
order sheet as per the guidelines issued by the Co-ordinate
Bench of this Court. Therefore, the criminal proceedings against
the petitioner is not sustainable and hence, liable to be
quashed.
7. Accordingly, the petition is allowed.
The criminal proceedings against the petitioners-accused
Nos.1 and 2 in C.C.No.279/2022, pending on the file of
Principal Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate First Class, Hiriyur,
Chitradurga District is hereby quashed.
8. In view of disposal of the main petition, pending
I.A.No.1/2023 does not survive for consideration and the same
is disposed of.
Sd/-
JUDGE
GBB
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!