Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 12062 Kant
Judgement Date : 22 September, 2022
M.F.A.No.1494/2014
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2022
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S.MUDAGAL
AND
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.RACHAIAH
MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.1494/2014(FC)
BETWEEN:
SMT.JAYA RANI
W/O SRI.M VINOD KUMAR
AGED 29 YEARS
R/AT NO.487, 6TH CROSS
9TH MAIN, 2ND BLOCK
H.B.R. LAYOUT
KACHARAKANAHALLI
KALYANA NAGAR
BANGALORE - 560 085
R/AT NO.618/A, GROUND FLOOR
VEERABHADRAPPA ROAD
R.S.PALYA, MARUTHISEVANAGAR P.O.
BANGALORE - 560 033 ...APPELLANT
(BY SMT.T.R.RAJESHWARI, ADVOCATE)
AND:
SRI.VINOD KUMAR
S/O B.N.MOHAN
AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS
R/AT NO.132, "SAI NILAYA"
ST.THOMAS TOWN POST
KAMMANAHALLI
BANGALORE
R/AT NO.618/A, GROUND FLOOR
VEERABHADRAPPA ROAD
R.S.PALYA, MARUTHISEVANAGAR P.O.
M.F.A.No.1494/2014
2
BANGALORE - 560 033 ...RESPONDENT
(BY SRI.G.DEVARAJ, ADVOCATE)
THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER
SECTION 19(1) OF THE FAMILY COURT ACT,1984 PRAYING TO SET
ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 21.11.2013 PASSED
BY THE PRINCIPAL JUDGE, FAMILY COURT, BANGALORE IN
M.C.NO.91/2012.
THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL COMING ON FOR
FURTHER HEARING THIS DAY, K.S.MUDAGAL J., DELIVERED
THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Appellant, respondent and their respective counsel are
present. The parties are duly identified by their respective
counsel. Parties filed joint applications under Section
13(B)(1) and 13(B)(2) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 ( for
short 'the Act')
2. Heard the parties on the applications. The parties
admits voluntary execution of the applications and terms of
settlement.
3. Aggrieved by the decree of divorce granted by
the trial Court in M.C.No.91/2012, the wife has preferred this
appeal. The trial court has granted decree of divorce under
Section 13(1)(ia) of the Act.
M.F.A.No.1494/2014
4. Out of the marriage on 10.10.2011 the couple
begot son by name Arjun. Admittedly, after the birth of the
child the parties are living separately. The petition for divorce
before the trial Court itself was filed in 2012.
5. Having regard to the fact that the respondent has
already remarried and has two children out of the second
marriage, the parties have decided that conjugal reunion is
not possible. The respondent has withdrawn all the
allegations made against the appellant. Satisfied that there is
no coercive compulsion to the parties in filing these
applications.
6. The terms of settlement between the parties
regarding custody of the child and alimony as stated in para
Nos.10 to 12 of the application are as follows:
"10. The appellant/ applicant No.1 respondent/ applicant No.2 submit that the child shall be in the permanent custody of the appellant/ applicant No.1 and the respondent/ applicant No.2 shall have the visitation rights as and when he wishes. The respondent/ applicant No.2 shall before visiting the child inform the appellant/applicant No.1.
11. The respondent applicant No.2 has in view of the settlement agreed to pay a monthly maintenance of Rs.15,000/- towards appellant applicant No.1 and Rs.10,000/- towards the child Master Arjun every month and he undertakes to transfer the said amount M.F.A.No.1494/2014
every month to the account of the appellant/ applicant No.1 within 10th of every month. The respondent/ applicant No.2 agreed to pay enhanced maintenance at 5% for once in every three years.
12. The respondent further undertakes to bear the educational expenses of the child such as school fee, books, uniforms, tuition, travelling expenses and also for the curricular activities of the child when ever he desire. The respondent/ applicant No.2 further assures that he will give his support in all aspects for the total and healthy upbringing of the child. And shall be a supporting father".
7. Having regard to the aforesaid facts and
circumstances and agreement between the parties for
dissolution of marriage by mutual consent, permission is
granted to convert the petition from one under Section
13(1)(ia) to 13(B)(1) of the Act. Exercising the discretion
under Section 13(B)(2) of the Act the waiting period of six
months is waived of. The impugned judgment and decree of
the trial Court has to be set aside.
9. In view of agreement of the parties as aforesaid,
the appeal is allowed. The impugned judgment and decree is
hereby set aside. The marriage between the appellant and
respondent solemnized on 31.07.2006 is hereby dissolved by
mutual consent of the parties.
M.F.A.No.1494/2014
i) The respondent shall have the visitation rights as
and when he wishes with prior intimation to the
appellant/wife and she shall cooperate for the same.
ii) He shall pay maintenance of Rs.15,000/- per
month to the appellant/wife till her lifetime or till she
remarries.
iii) He shall pay maintenance of Rs.10,000/- per
month to the son/Master Arjun till completion of his
education.
iv) The aforesaid maintenance shall be revised with
the hike at the rate of 5% once in three years.
v) He shall bear the educational expenses of the
child such as School fee, Books, Uniforms, Travelling
expenses, Tuition fee, curricular activities as and when
required.
vi) As a parent the respondent shall also extend all
support to the appellant in total healthy upbringing of the
child as agreed by him before the Court.
M.F.A.No.1494/2014
Draw decree accordingly.
In view of disposal of the main appeal, pending IAs
stood disposed of.
Sd/-
JUDGE
Sd/-
JUDGE
PKN
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!