Monday, 04, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Sharanappa S/O Ramanna vs Tukaram S/O Earappa Ningdalli And ...
2022 Latest Caselaw 12572 Kant

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 12572 Kant
Judgement Date : 19 October, 2022

Karnataka High Court
Sharanappa S/O Ramanna vs Tukaram S/O Earappa Ningdalli And ... on 19 October, 2022
Bench: Sachin Shankar Magadum
                            1




          IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

                   GULBARGA BENCH

     DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2014

                        BEFORE

 THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B. SREENIVASE GOWDA

       REGULAR SECOND APPEAL No.200249/2014

BETWEEN:

1.    SHARANAPPA S/O RAMANNA
      AGE: 67 YEARS, OCC: COOLIE

2.    SUBHASH S/O GUNDAPPA
      AGE: 65 YEARS, OCC: COOLIE

3.    NEELAMMA W/O SURESH
      AGE: 62 YEARS, OCC: COOLIE

4.    RAJAPPA S/O MALLAPPA POTE
      AGE: 55 YEARS, OCC: COOLIE

5.    KANTEPPA S/O DEVAPPA POTENOOR
      AGE: 73 YEARS, OCC: COOLIE

6.    DASRATH
      S/O RAMANNA MALEGNAVARU
      AGE: 73 YEARS, OCC: COOLIE

7.    KALLAPPA S/O LALAPPA POTENOOR
      AGE: 64 YEARS, OCC: COOLIE

8.    SHIVAMMA W/O BASAPPA SHERIKAR
      AGE: 73 YEARS, OCC: COOLIE

9.    RAGHUNATH S/O MANIKAPPA KAMBAR
      AGE: 65 YEARS, OCC: COOLIE
                             2




10.   SHARANAPPA S/O NOT KNOWN POTE
      AGE: 80 YEARS, OCC: COOLIE

11.   DHARMANNA
      S/O SAIBANNA NADVINDODERU
      AGE: 75 YEARS, OCC: COOLIE

12.   JAGANNATH S/O NOT KNOWN
      AGE: 69 YEARS, OCC: COOLIE

13.   JAIRAJ S/O RAMANNA
      AGE: 55 YEARS, OCC: COOLIE

14.   TIPPAMMA W/O AMRUTH
      AGE: 70 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE

15.   SURYAKANTH S/O AMRUTH
      AGE: 53 YEARS, OCC: COOLIE

16.   ANILKUMAR S/O AMRUTH
      AGE: 50 YEARS, OCC: COOLIE

17.   YESHAPPA S/O AMRUTH
      AGE: 45 YEARS, OCC: COOLIE

18.   SATISH S/O AMRUTH
      AGE: 40 YEARS, OCC: COOLIE

19.   SIROMANI S/O DEVENDRA
      AGE: 73 YEARS, OCC: COOLIE

20.   BABU S/O RAMANNA
      AGE: 54 YEARS, OCC: COOLIE

21.   NAGAPPA S/O SIDDAPPA SHERIKAR
      AGE: 45 YEARS, OCC: COOLIE

22.   SUNIL S/O JAIVANT
      AGE: 44 YEARS, OCC: COOLIE

23.   DROPATI W/O PUTTRANNA
      AGE: 65 YEARS
      OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK
                              3




24.    REVAMMA
       W/O LACHAPPA PATTENAVARU
       AGE: 68 YEARS
       OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK

25.    PRABHU
       S/O LACHAPPA PATTENAVARU
       AGE: 45 YEARS, OCC: COOLIE

26.    GAUTAM
       S/O LACHAPPA PATTENAVARU
       AGE: 43 YEARS, OCC: COOLIE

27.    JAGADEVI D/O TIPPANNA
       AGE: 45 YEARS
       OCC: HOUSE HOLD WORK
       ALL ARE R/O WALKHINDI
       TQ. HUMNABAD, DIST. BIDAR            ... APPELLANTS

(BY SRI R.V.NADAGOUDA, ADVOCATE-ABSENT)

AND:

1.     TUKARAM S/O EARAPPA NINGADALLI
       AGE: 71 YEARS, OCC: COOLIE

2.     BANDEPPA S/O MADEPPA NINGADALLI
       AGE: 47 YEARS, OCC: COOLIE

3.     GANGAMMA W/O SHIVARAYA NINGADALLI
       AGE: 77 YEARS, OCC: COOLIE

4.     BASAPPA S/O SHIVARAYA NINGADALLI
       AGE: 55 YEARS, OCC: COOLIE

5.     JAGANNATH S/O SHIVARAYA NINGADALLI
       AGE: 49 YEARS, OCC: COOLIE

       ALL ARE R/O WALKHINDI
       TQ. HUMNABAD, DIST. BIDAR

                                          ... RESPONDENTS
                                    4




     THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL IS FILED UNDER
SECTION 100 OF CPC AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE
DATED 08.07.2014 PASSED IN R.A.NO.03/2013 ON THE FILE OF
THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT HUMNABAD, DISMISSING THE
APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE
DATED 07.12.2012 PASSED IN O.S. NO.80/2006 ON THE FILE
OF THE PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AT HUMNABAD.

    THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE
COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:



                            ORDER

This appeal was filed on 11.08.2014. As the

appellants had failed to comply with the office

objections within six weeks' time, the appeal came to be

listed before Court for Orders on 13.10.2014 as

contemplated under Rule 17 of Chapter XII of High

Court of Karnataka Rules, 1959, regarding non-

compliance of office objections, on which day the

following order came to be passed:

"Appellants are finally granted time up to 10.11.2014 for compliance of office objections, failing which, list the appeal for orders on 13.11.2014 as to why the appeal

should not be dismissed for non-compliance of office objections."

2. Today, neither the office objections are

complied with nor there is representation for the

appellants. From the above facts, it is clear that

appellants are not interested in prosecuting the appeal.

3. Hence, the appeal is dismissed for non-

prosecution.

Sd/-

JUDGE

NB*

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter