Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 7371 Kant
Judgement Date : 24 May, 2022
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF MAY, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE B.M.SHYAM PRASAD
MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.1010/2015 (CPC)
BETWEEN:
SRI A C SRINIVAS
S/O LATE CHINNA VENKATAIAH
AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS
R/A CHOKKANNA HALLI VILLAGE
YELAHANKA HOBLI
BANGALORE NORTH TALUK
... APPELLANT
(BY SRI. J V CHANDRA SHEKAR, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. SRI M RAMU
S/O LATE MARIYAPPA
AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS
R/A NO.18, 3RD MAIN, 4TH CROSS
MALLESHPALYA, NEW THIPPASANDRA
BANGALORE-560075
2. SRI KEMPANNA
S/O LATE BADRAPPA
AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS
R/A CHOKKANA HALLI VILLAGE
JAKKUR POST
YELAHANKA HOBLI
BANGALORE NORTH TALUK
3. SRI VISHNU R MAKHIJA
S/O RAMACHANDRA MAKHIJA
-2-
AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS
R/A NO.36, IST MAIN
GANGENA HALLI
GANGANAGAR LAYOUT
BANGALORE-560032
4. SRI K K SUNITHA
D/O K K KEMPAIAH
AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS
R/A NO.733
PATEL MUNIVENKATAPPA LAYOUT
BANGALORE-560032
5. SMT MUNITHAYAMMA
D/O LATE BADRAPPA
AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS
R/A CHOKKANA HALLI VILLAGE
JAKKUR POST
YELAHANKA HOBLI
BANGALORE NORTH TALUK
... RESPONDENTS
(NOTICE TO R2 TO R4 DISPENSED WITH)
THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER
ORDER 43 RULE 1(r) OF CPC, AGAINST THE ORDER DATED
15.10.2014 PASSED BY THE COURT OF FAST TRACK COURT-I,
BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT, BANGALORE, PASSED ON I.A.NO.2
IN O.S.NO.204/2008 AND DISMISS I.A.NO.2 FILED BY THE 1ST
RESPONDENT UNDER ORDER 39 RULE 1 AND 2 READ WITH
SECTION 151 OF CPC.
THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL COMING ON FOR
ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
-3-
JUDGMENT
The appellant, who is the fourth defendant in
O.S.No.204/2008 on the file of the Fast Track Court-I,
Bengaluru Rural District, Bengaluru (for short, 'the civil
Court'), has impugned the order dated 15.10.2014. The
civil Court by this order has allowed the first respondent's
application (I.A.No.2) restraining the appellant as well as
the other defendants from alienating the suit schedule
properties till the disposal of the suit. The appellant is
concerned with suit Item No.4 viz., land measuring 1 acre
in Sy.No.83/2 of Chokkana Halli Village, Yelahanka Hobli,
Bengaluru North Taluk.
It is submitted that during the pendency of this
appeal the first respondent - the plaintiff and the eighth
and ninth defendants have executed Confirmation Deed
dated 31.01.2022 declaring that they do not have any
subsisting interest in the suit schedule item No.4 property
and that they will be bound by the terms of the sale deed in
favour of the appellant. They have also filed a memo in this
regard and consequentially the civil Court has disposed of
the suit as against the appellant while continuing the suit
as against the defendant Nos.1 and 5 to 9. It becomes
obvious from the afore that the appeal is rendered
infructuous and therefore, the appeal stands disposed of
accordingly.
SD/-
JUDGE
RB
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!