Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 5370 Kant
Judgement Date : 24 March, 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF MARCH, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.S.SANJAY GOWDA
MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 100502 OF 2021 (CPC)
BETWEEN:
1. BASAPPA S/O BASAPPA OLI
AGE 69 YEARS, OCC AGRICULTURE,
R/O TAVARAGERA, TQ KUSHTAGI,
DIST KOPPAL.
2. DODDAPPA S/O RAMAPPA OLI,
DECEASED BY HIS LRS.
2A. BASAMMA W/O DODDAPPA OLI
AGE 52 YEARS, OCC HOUSEHOLD,
R/O TAVARAGERE.
2B. LAXMI W/O LINGANAGOUDA AARALI
AGE 33 YEARS, OCC HOUSEHOLD,
R/O SINDHANOOR, DIST RAICHUR.
2C. NAGARAJ S/O DODDAPPA OLI
AGE 30 YEARS, OCC AGRICULTURE,
R/O TAVARAGERE, TQ KUSHTAGI.
3. MALLAPPA S/O RAMAPPA OLI
AGE 37 YEARS, OCC AGRICULTURE,
R/O TAVARAGERA, TQ KUSHTAGI,
DIST KOPPAL.
4. GIRIJAMMA W/O AYYANGOUDA
AGE 46 YEARS, OCC HOUSEHOLD,
R/O NARASAPURA, TQ GANGAVATHI,
DIST KOPPAL.
-2-
MFA No. 100502 of 2021
5. SUJATHA W/O GAVISIDDAPPA
AGE 34 YEARS, OCC HOUSEHOLD,
R/O MANGALUR, KUDARIMOTHI,
TQ YALABURGA, DIST KOPPAL.
6. BASANAGOUDA S/O SAKRIGOUDA POLICE PATIL
AGE 55 YEARS, OCC AGRICULTURE,
R/O TAVARAGERA, TQ KUSHTAGI.
...PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. SADIQ N GOODWALA.,ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. CHANDRASHEKHARGOUDA
S/O MALLIKARJUNGOUDA PATIL
AGE 50 YEARS, OCC AGRICULTURE,
R/O TAVARAGERA, TQ KUSHTAGI,
DIST KOPPAL.
2. SHIVARAJ GOUDA S/O CHANDRASHEKHARGOUDA
AGE 25 YEARS,
OCC AGRICULTURE AND BUSINESS,
R/O TAVARAGERA,
TQ KUSHTAGI,
DIST KOPPAL.
3. SHANTAMMA W/O SHARANAPPA
AGE 70 YEARS, OCC HOUSEHOLD,
R/O KUSHTAGI, DIST KOPPAL.
4. LALITHAMMA W/O CHANNANAGOUDA
AGE 65 YEARS, OCC HOUSEHOLD,
R/O TAVARAGERA, TQ KUSHTAGI,
DIST KOPPAL.
5. SARASWATHI W/O SHANTAGOUDA
AGE 62 YEARS, OCC HOUSEHOLD,
R/O KANAKAGIRI, TQ KUSHTAGI,
DIST KOPPAL.
-3-
MFA No. 100502 of 2021
6. BASALINGAMMA W/O SHARANGOUDA
AGE 60 YEARS, OCC HOUSEHOLD,
R/O HALGERI, DIST KOPPAL.
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. SANTOSHKUMAR G. RAMPEER, ADV. FOR R1, 2
AND 4 TO 6)
MFA FILED UNDER ORDER 43 RULE 1(r) OF THE CODE OF
CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER
DTD.05.03.2021 PASSED BY SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,
KUSTAGI IN O.S. NO.61/2019 ON I.A.NO.1 BY ALLOWING THE
APPEAL, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.
THIS APPEAL IS COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE
COURT MADE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
This appeal is directed against the refusal of the Trial
Court to grant an injunction to restrain the defendants
from alienating the suit property.
2. The learned counsel for the respondents
submits that the defendants have no intention to alienate
the suit property and even if they do have an intention in
future, they will inform the Court and seeks its permission
for alienation of the property.
MFA No. 100502 of 2021
3. In view of the above submission, it would be
unnecessary to pass any orders on the merits of the
application of the plaintiff. In the event, the respondent
intends to alienate the property, he shall seek the
permission of the Court and then sell the property.
4. Accordingly, the appeal is disposed off.
5. The Trial Court shall endeavor to dispose off the
suit as expeditiously as possible, subject to the counsel
and the parties co-operating with the Court for the
disposal.
All pending IA's shall stand disposed off.
Sd/-
JUDGE
SMM
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!