Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 9968 Kant
Judgement Date : 29 June, 2022
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
KALABURAGI BENCH
DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF JUNE 2022
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAJENDRA BADAMIKAR
MSA No.200053/2020 (LA)
BETWEEN:
DEVINDRAPPA S/O BHIMANNA @ BHIMASHAPPA
AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS OCC AGRICULTURE,
R/O ALLUR(B) - 585222,
TQ CHITTAPUR DIST KALABURAGI
...APPELLANT
(BY SRI.KAREDDY SHARANABASAPPA APPANAGOUDA [ABSENT])
AND:
1. THE SPL LAO, M AND MIP
KALABURAGI
2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
KALABURAGI
3. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER
M.I. DIVISION, KALABURAGI
.....RESPONDENTS
THIS MSA FILED UNDER SECTION 54(2) OF L.A.ACT,
PRAYING TO ALLOW THE APPEAL WITH COSTS AND IMPUGNED
JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 22.11.2019 PASSED BY THE IV
ADDL. DISTRICT JUDGE, KALABURAGI IN LACA NO.582/2019
TO BE MODIFIED BY ENHANCING THE AMOUNT OF
COMPENSATION AT THE RATE OF 1,87,657/- PER ACRE WITH
ALL BENEFITS AND WITH COST.
2
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE
COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:-
JUDGMENT
There is no representation on behalf of the appellant.
Even during the course of second call, there is no
representation. Inspite of granting sufficient opportunities,
office objections are not complied with. Hence, the appeal
stands dismissed for non-compliance of office objections.
Sd/-
JUDGE
msr
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!