Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 9610 Kant
Judgement Date : 24 June, 2022
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF JUNE 2022
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H. T. NARENDRA PRASAD
MFA No. 6446 OF 2019 (MV)
BETWEEN:
SRI. CHANDRAIAH @ CHANDRANNA
S/O RANGAIAH,
AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS,
R/AT NO.208, SASALU,
SHETTYKER HOBLI, HALASENDI BIDI,
KASABA, CHHAVADI,
CHIKKANAYAKANAHALLI-572 214.
...APPELLANT
(BY SRI. RAJU S., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LTD.,
SHANKARANARAYANA BUILDING,
NO.25, FLOOR NO.1,
M.G.ROAD, BANGALORE-560 001.
REPRESENTED BY
THE BRANCH MANAGER.
2. THE MD, VRL LOGISTICS LTD.,
REGD AND ADMIN OFFICE,
NH-4, BANGALORE,
VARUR, HUBLI-580 029.
...RESPONDENTS
2
(BY SRI. B.C. SHIVANNE GOWDA, ADVOCATE FOR R1
NOTICE TO R2 IS DISPENSED WITH)
THIS MFA IS FILED U/S.173(1) OF MV ACT,
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DT.11.07.2019
PASSED IN MVC NO.1678/2018 ON THE FILE OF THE
COURT OF SMALL CAUSES AND MACT, BENGALURU,
PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR
COMPENSATION AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF
COMPENSATION.
THIS MFA COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS
DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
This appeal under Section 173(1) of Motor
Vehicles Act, 1988 (hereinafter referred to as 'the
Act') has been filed by the claimant being aggrieved
by the judgment and decree dated 11.07.2019,
passed by the Court of Small Causes and Motor
Accident Claims Tribunal, Bangalore in MVC
No.1678/2018.
2. Facts giving rise to the filing of the appeal
briefly stated are that on 29.05.2013, at about 2.30
p.m., the claimant was proceeding on motorcycle
bearing registration No.KA-44-K-5142 as a pillion
rider, when they reached near Jayanthi Village
towards Tiptur, at that time, lorry bearing registration
No. KA-25-B-4824, being driven by its driver at a high
speed and in a rash and negligent manner, dashed to
the vehicle in which the claimant was proceeding. As
a result of the aforesaid accident, the claimant
sustained grievous injuries and was hospitalized.
3. The claimant filed a petition under Section
166 of the Act seeking compensation. It was pleaded
that he spent huge amount towards medical
expenses, conveyance, etc. It was further pleaded
that the accident occurred purely on account of the
rash and negligent driving of the offending vehicle by
its driver.
4. On service of notice, the respondents
appeared through counsel and filed written statement
in which the averments made in the petition were
denied.
5. On the basis of the pleadings of the parties,
the Claims Tribunal framed the issues and thereafter
recorded the evidence. The claimant himself was
examined as PW-1 and got exhibited documents
namely Ex.P1 to Ex.P13. On behalf of the
respondents, no witness was examined but got
exhibited document namely Ex.R1. The Claims
Tribunal, by the impugned judgment, inter alia, held
that the accident took place on account of rash and
negligent driving of the offending vehicle by its driver,
as a result of which, the claimant sustained injuries.
The Tribunal further held that the claimant is entitled
to a global compensation of Rs.1,00,000/- along with
interest at the rate of 8% p.a. and directed the
Insurance Company to deposit the compensation
amount along with interest. Being aggrieved, this
appeal has been filed.
6. The learned counsel for the claimant has
contended that due to the accident, the claimant has
sustained grievous injuries. He was treated as
inpatient for a period of 8 days. Even after discharge
from the hospital, he was not in a position to
discharge his regular work. He has suffered lot of
pain during treatment. He has spent Rs.93,208/- for
medical expenses. Considering the same, the global
compensation granted by the Tribunal is on the lower
side. Hence, he sought for allowing the appeal.
7. On the other hand, the learned counsel for
the Insurance Company has contended that the
injuries suffered by the claimant are minor in nature
and he has not examined the doctor. Considering the
injuries mentioned in the wound certificate, the
compensation awarded by the Tribunal is just and
reasonable.
Lastly, he contended that the interest awarded
by the tribunal at 8% is on higher side, contrary to
the judgment of a Division Bench of this Court in the
case of JOYEETA BOSE -V- UNITED INSURANCE
CO. Hence, he sought for dismissal of the appeal.
8. Heard the learned counsel for the parties
and perused the records.
9. It is not in dispute that the claimant has
sustained injuries in the road traffic accident occurred
due to rash and negligent driving of the offending
vehicle by its driver.
As per wound certificate, the claimant has
sustained comminuted fracture of anterrior, medial
and posterior walls of left orbit fracture of left
zygomatricarch, left perobital and peri zygomaticosoft
tissue swelling and fracture of 2nd lateral end (3rd,
4th, 5th, 6th and 8th ribs) on the right side of the
chest and sustained other grievous injuries all over
the body. As per medical prescriptions-Ex-P10 and
medical bills-Ex-P11, he has spent Rs.93,208/- for
medical expenses. Considering the same, I am of the
opinion that in addition to the compensation awarded
by the Tribunal, Rs.50,000/- to be awarded with 6%
interest.
10. In the result, the appeal is allowed in
part. The judgment of the Claims Tribunal is modified.
In view of the law laid down by a Division Bench
of this Court in JOYEETA BOSE (supra), enhanced
compensation carries interest at 6% p.a.
The Insurance Company is directed to deposit
the compensation amount along with interest at 8%
p.a. (enhanced compensation shall carry interest at
6% per annum) from the date of filing of the claim
petition till the date of realization, within a period of
six weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this
judgment.
Sd/-
JUDGE
JY
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!