Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 8633 Kant
Judgement Date : 13 June, 2022
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF JUNE 2022
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAMMAD NAWAZ
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.831/2022
BETWEEN:
MR.P.SELVA KUMAR
S/O LATE PONNAIAH
AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS
C/O KRISHNA KUMARI
R/AT NO.8, 3RD MAIN ROAD
NEAR GANGA BAKERY
GANGANAGAR EXTENSION
R.T.NAGAR, BENGALURU-560 032 ...APPELLANT
(BY SRI PRAVEEN.C, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY HALASURU GATE POLICE STATION
REP BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
HIGH COURT BUILDING
BENGALURU-560 001
2. THE POLICE INSPECTOR
DIRECTORATE OF CIVIL RIGHTS ENFORCEMENT
BENGALURU HEAD QUARTERS
CAUVERY BHAVAN
BENGALURU-560 002 ...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI R.D RENUKARADHYA, HCGP FOR R1;
SRI C.JAGADEESHA, ADVOCATE FOR R2)
THIS CRIMINAL APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION
14(A)(2) OF THE SCHEDULED CASTES & SCHEDULED TRIBES
(PREVENTION OF ATROCITIES) ACT PRAYING TO SET ASIDE
THE ORDER DATED 08.04.2022 PASSED BY LXX ADDITIONAL
CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE AND SPECIAL JUDGE AT
BENGALURU IN CRL.MISC.NO.2941/2022 AND TO RELEASE
THE APPELLANT ON BAIL IN THE EVENT OF HIS ARREST IN
2
CR.NO.41/2022 FOR THE OFFENCE PUNISHABLE UNDER
SECTIONS 177, 181, 196, 198, 420 OF IPC AND UNDER
SECTION 3(1)(Q) OF THE SCHEDULED CASTE & SCHEDULED
TRIBE (PREVENTION OF ATROCITIES) ACT, 1989 ETC.
THIS CRIMINAL APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS
DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
This appeal is preferred by the accused praying to
release him on anticipatory bail in connection with a case
registered in Crime No.41/2022 of Halasurgate Police
Station, Bengaluru City registered for the offences
punishable under Sections 177, 181, 196, 198, 420 of IPC
and under Section 3(1)(q) of the Scheduled Castes &
Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989
(hereinafter referred to 'SC & ST Act').
2. Heard the learned Counsel for the appellant
and learned High Court Government Pleader for
respondent No.1/State.
3. The complaint is lodged by the police officer,
DCRE Cell. The allegations are that the ancestors of the
accused belongs to Christian community and suppressing
the same he obtained caste certificate claiming to be 'Adi
Dravida' which comes under the Scheduled Caste and
secured a Government job and thereby committed the
aforementioned offences.
4. Learned Counsel for the appellant would
contend that even according to the complaint, the
accused and his ancestors belongs to 'Pariya' community
which comes under the Scheduled Caste in Tamilnadu.
Therefore, he contends that the allegations are without
any substance. He further contends that the order of the
District Caste Verification Committee is under challenge
before this Court in W.P.No.10719/2022. He further
submits that the appellant had an unblemished career
and he took voluntary retirement from his job. Now on
the basis of false allegation he may be arrested etc., He
submits that the learned Sessions Judge without properly
appreciating the entire facts and circumstances,
erroneously rejected the prayer for anticipatory bail.
5. Learned Counsel appearing for respondent
No.2 contends that the District Caste Verification
Committee after thorough enquiry has found that the
appellant/accused by misrepresenting, obtained a false
caste certificate on the basis of which he secured a job in
the Indian Institute of Science. He submits that there is a
prima-facie case, hence the learned Sessions judge has
rightly rejected the petition under Section 438 of Cr.PC as
there is a bar to entertain any such petition in view of
Sections 18 and 18-A of SC & ST Act.
6. A perusal of the complaint averments goes to
show that originally the complainant belong to 'Pariya'
caste which comes under Scheduled Caste in Tamilnadu.
It is alleged that the ancestors of the appellant were
Christians and after conversion, knowing fully well that
they do not belong to scheduled caste, obtained a false
caste certificate. Admittedly now the order dated
22.12.2021 passed by the District Caste Verification
Committee annulling the caste certificate of the appellant
is under challenge before this Court in
W.P.No.10719/2022.
7. According to the complaint itself the appellant
belongs to 'Pariya' caste which comes under the
scheduled caste in Tamilnadu. Whether the appellant has
willfully obtained the case certificate by suppressing the
material fact is a matter which has to be established in
due course. In that view of the matter, it cannot be said
that there is a prima-facie case against the appellant at
this stage. Prosecution has to establish its case in a full
fledged trial. Hence the following:
ORDER
The criminal appeal is allowed.
The order dated 08.04.2022 passed by LXX
Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge and Special Judge
at Bengaluru (CCH.No.71) in Crl.Misc.No.2941/2022 is
hereby set aside.
The appellant - Accused shall be enlarged on bail in
the event of his arrest in Crime No.41/2022 of
Halasurgate Police Station, Bangalore City, registered for
offences punishable under Sections 177, 181, 196, 198,
420 of IPC and under Section 3(1)(q) of the Scheduled
Castes & Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act,
1989, subject to following conditions:
(i) Appellant shall appear before the Investigation Officer within a period of ten days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and shall execute a personal bond in a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lakh only)
with a surety for like sum and shall cooperate with the investigation of the case.
(ii) Appellant shall furnish proof of his correct residential address and shall inform the court regarding change of address, if any.
(iii) Appellant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence/ witnesses in any manner.
(iv) Appellant shall appear before the Investigating Officer for the purpose of investigation as and when required.
(v) Appellant shall appear before the trial court on all dates of hearing.
Sd/-
JUDGE
PKN
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!