Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 963 Kant
Judgement Date : 20 January, 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.I.ARUN
R.F.A. NO.875 OF 2018 (DEC)
BETWEEN:
1. C.VENUGOPAL
S/O LATE CHINNAPPA NAIDU
AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS
2. C.DEVARAJ
S/O LATE CHINNAPPA NAIDU
AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS
3. R. RAVI
S/O LATE RAMDASS
AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS
4. SMT. ANJALI
W/O LATE RAJA
AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS
5. R. KARTHIK
S/O LATE RAJA
AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS
6. R.SURESH
S/O LATE RAJA
AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS
ALL ARE R/AT U-15/2
7TH MAIN, 8TH CROSS
HARIJAN COLONY
2
SRIRAMPURAM
BANGALORE-560 021 ... APPELLANTS
(BY SRI.A.M. SURYA PRAKASH, ADV.[ABSENT])
AND:
BRUHAT BANGALORE MAHANAGARA PALIKE
NARASIMHARAJA SQUARE
BANGALORE - 560 001
REP. BY ITS COMMISSIONER ... RESPONDENT
THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER
SECTION 96 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND
DECREE DATED 12.02.2018 PASSED IN OS NO.2169/2013
ON THE FILE OF THE XXXIX ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND
SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU CITY, DISMISSING THE
SUIT FOR DECLARATION AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION.
THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL COMING ON FOR
ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT THROUGH VIDEO
CONFERENCE DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
In spite of several opportunities, the office objections
have not been complied with.
On 29.06.2021, the following order was passed:-
"At request of learned counsel for the appellants, one week time is granted to comply with the office objections, failing which, list the appeal for dismissal."
Inispite of it, the office objections have not been
complied with and even today, the learned counsel for the
appellants is absent. It appears that the appellants are
not interested in prosecuting the appeal. Accordingly, the
appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/-
JUDGE
MH/-
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!