Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 2443 Kant
Judgement Date : 15 February, 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2022
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM
RSA.NO.5922/2012 (PAR)
BETWEEN
1. SRI.MALLAPPA S/O MARUTI MANAGUTTI @ KAMBLE,
AGED: 56 YEARS, OCC: SERVICE,R/O: SHARADA NILAYA,
VIDYANAGAR,RAIBAG, DIST: BELGAUM.
2. SMT.SHARAVATI @ SARAWATI,
W/O MARUTI MANAGUTTI @ KAMBLE,AGE: 69 YEARS, OCC:
HOUSEHOLD WORK andAGRICULTURE, R/O: SHARADA
NILAYA, VIDYANAGAR,RAIBAG, DIST: BELGAUM.
3. SMT.JAYASHREE W/O MAHADEV KAMBLE,
AGE: MAJOR, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK, R/O: INDIRANAGAR,
SANGLI, TQ and DIST: SANGLI, STATE: MAHARASHTRA.
4. SMT.VIMALAWWA W/O RAMA KAMBLE,
AGE: MAJOR, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK,R/O: AMBEDKAR
NAGAR, TQ: RAIBAG,DIST: BELGAUM.
5. SMT.LAXMI W/O KRISHNAPPA MASANAIK,
AGE: MAJOR, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK,R/O: AMBEDKAR
NAGAR, TQ: RAIBAG,DIST: BELGAUM.
6. SRI.KRISHNAPPA S/O MALLAPPA MANAGUTTI @ KAMBLE,
AGE: MAJOR, OCC: AGRICULTURE,R/O: VIDYANAGAR,
RAIBAG,DIST: BELGAUM.
7. SRI.SHANKAR S/O MALLAPPA MANAGUTTI @ KAMBLE,
AGE: MAJOR, OCC: AGRICULTURE,R/O: VIDYANAGAR,
RAIBAG,DIST: BELGAUM.
... APPELLANTS
(BY SRI.CHETAN MUNNOLI, ADV. FOR SRI.R.M.KULKARNI, ADV.)
2
AND
1. SRI.LAXMAN S/O BASAVANT MANAGUTTI @ KAMBLE,
AGE: 30 YEARS, OCC: COOLIE,
R/O: MEKHALI, TQ: RAIBAG, DIST: BELGAUM.
2. SRI.KOTEPPA S/O BASAVANT MANAGUTTI @ KAMBLE,
AGE: 33 YEARS, OCC: LEGAL PRACTITIONER,
R/O: VIVEK NAGAR, RAIBAG,DIST: BELGAUM.
3. SMT.SAVAKKA W/O BASAVANT MANAUTTI @ KAMBLE,
AGE: 54 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK,
R/O: MEKHALI, TQ: RAIBAG,DIST: BELGAUM.
4. SRI.BASAVANT S/O MARUTI MANAGUTTI @ KAMBLE,
AGE: 59 YEARS, OCC: TAILORING,
R/O: MEKHALI, TQ: RAIBAG,DIST: BELGAUM.
5. SRI.MARUTI S/O LAXMAN MANAUTTI @ KAMBLE,
AGE: 74 YEARS, OCC: NIL,
R/O: MEKHALI, TQ: RAIBAG,DIST: BELGAUM.
6. SMT.SHANTAVVA W/O MAHADEV MADALE @ MANAGUTTI,
AGE: 46 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK, and
AGRICULTURE, R/O: MEKHALI, TQ: RAIBAG, DIST: BELGAUM.
... RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI.RAJASHEKHAR BURJI, ADV. FOR C/R2)
THIS APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC PRAYING
TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 06.08.2012 IN
R.A.NO.200/2011 ON THE FILE OF THE FAS TRACK COURT-I,
CHIKKODI REVERSING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED
23.04.2011 IN O.S.NO.71/2008 ON THE FILE OF THE CIVIL JUDGE
(SR.DN.) RAIBAG IN SO FAR AS ITEM NO.2 AND 6 OF SCHEDULE 'A'
IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY, THE
COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
3
JUDGMENT
Both the counsel on record would submit to this court
that this matter is amicably settled in the subsequent
comprehensive suit filed in O.S.No.366/2014.
2. The case status is placed on record by the
registry. On perusal of the same, this court would find that
parties to the present appeal have amicably settled the
matter by referring the subsequent suit to Lok Adalath
where compromise is recorded.
3. In that view of the matter, the present appeal
does not survive for consideration. Accordingly, the appeal
stands disposed off, by taking note of the settlement
arrived at by the parties in the subsequent suit.
SD/-
JUDGE MBS/-
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!