Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 2190 Kant
Judgement Date : 10 February, 2022
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2022
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H. T. NARENDRA PRASAD
WRIT PETITION No.24607/2021(LA-KIADB)
BETWEEN:
1. SRI R NATARAJU
S/O RAMAIAH
AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS
R/AT NO.1858
TUMKUR MAIN ROAD, PEENYA
BANGALORE NORTH-560058.
2. SMT.RAMAKKA
W/O LATE SHIVANNA
AGED 65 YEARS
R/AT BATHSANDRA VILLAGE
KORA HOBLI, TUMKUR TALUK
TUMKUR DISTRICT-572 138.
3. SRI.MANJUNATHA B.S.
S/O LATE SHIVANNA
AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS
R/AT BATHSANDRA VILLAGE
KORA HOBLI, TUMKUR TALUK
TUMKUR DISTRICT-572 138.
...PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. KUMUDA T A., ADV.(VC))
2
AND
1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY ITS SECRETARY
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
AND INDUSTRIES
VIDHANA SOUDHA
BANGALORE-01.
2. THE KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREA
DEVELOPMENT BOARD
BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND
EXECUTIVE MEMBER
KHANIJA BHAVAN
4TH AND 5TH FLOOR
RACE COURSE ROAD
BANGALORE-01.
3. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER
KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL
AREAS DEVELOPMENT BOARD
I FLOOR, MARUTHI TOWER
NEAR SIT MAIN GATE
TUMKUR-572 103.
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI.SESHU V., HCGP. FOR R1(PH):
SRI. P.V. CHANDRASHEKAR, ADV. FOR R2 & R3(PH))
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES
226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING
TO QUASH THE GENERAL AWARD BEARING DTD.
23.12.2013 PASSED BY R-3 IN RESPECT OF P-1 IS THE
ABSOLUTE OWNERS OF LAND BEARING SY.NO.11
MEASURING 2 ACRES 09 GUNTAS, AND P-2 AND 3 ARE
THE ABSOLUTE OWNERS OF LAND BEARING SY.NO.11
MEASURING 2 ACRES 11 GUNTAS, SITUATED AT
BATHSANDRA VILLAGE, KORA HOBLI, TUMKUR TALUK,
3
TUMKUR DISTRICT, OF PETITIONERS ARE CONCERNED,
WHICH IS PRODUCED AT ANNX-C AND ETC.
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS
THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Learned HCGP is directed to take notice for
respondent No.1.
Sri P. V. Chandrashekar, learned counsel is
directed to take notice for respondent Nos.2 and 3.
2. Learned counsel for the parties jointly
submitted that the matter is covered by a judgment of
this Court in W.P.No.14229/2021. In view of the
same, the matter is take up for final disposal.
3. Brief facts leading to filing of this writ
petition are that:
The petitioner No.1 is the absolute owner of land
bearing Sy.No.11 measuring 2 acre 09 guntas and
petitioner Nos.2 and 3 are the absolute owners of land
bearing Sy.No.11 measuring 2 acres 11 guntas
situated at Bathsandra Village, Kora Hobli, Tumkur
Taluk, Tumkur District. Petitioner No.2 husband i.e.
Shivanna, S/o Narasegowda died on 26.11.2016 and
after his death, the petitioners have been in
possession of the said lands. Respondent No.2 being
the statutory body established under the Karnataka
Industrial Areas Development Act, 1966 (for short 'the
Act'), has declared the lands of the petitioners and the
surrounding land as industrial area and issued a
notification under Section 1(3) 3(1) and 28(1) of the
Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Act, 1966
(for short 'the Act'). The petitioners have filed
objections seeking dropping of the acquisition of the
lands of the petitioners under Section 28(3) of the
Act. It is contended that respondent No.1 in
compliance of the provision of the Act has passed the
general award. Hence, this petition.
4. Heard the learned counsel for the
petitioners and also the learned counsel for the
respondents.
5. Learned counsel for the petitioners has
placed the reliance on the judgment of the Co-
ordinate Bench of this Court in W.P.No.14229/2021.
The grievance of the petitioners is that, while the
General Award passed by the respondent No.3-Special
Land Acquisition Officer-NIMZ was questioned by
some of the landlords, this Court in Smt.Rathnamma
Vs. The State of Karnataka in W.P.No.31702/2018,
by order dated 29.11.2018 has set aside the General
Award and directed the respondents to consider the
claim of the petitioner under Section 29(2) of the
KIADB Act, 1966, within a period of two months.
Therefore, it is the prayer of the petitioners that
similar orders may be passed in this writ petition to
set aside the General Award and direct the respondent
authorities to consider the claim for compensation
under Section 29(2) of the Act.
6. The submission of the learned counsel for
petitioners is not controverted at the hands of the
respondents.
7. Consequently, this Court proceeds to pass
the following:-
ORDER
1) Writ Petition is hereby allowed.
2) The impugned General award at Annexure-C dated 23.12.2013 passed by respondent No.3 in respect of land of petitioner No.1 bearing Sy.No.11 measuring 2 acre 09 guntas and land of petitioner Nos.2 and 3 bearing Sy.No.11 measuring 2 acres 11 guntas situated at Bathsandra Village, Kora Hobli, Tumkur Taluk, Tumkur District is hereby quashed and set aside.
3) Respondent No.3 (SLAO) is hereby directed to consider the claim of the petitioners under Section 29(2) of the KIADB Act, 1966 within a period of four months from the date of receipt of copy of this order.
4) It is made clear that in the event, if any dispute arises with regard to entitlement and apportionment of the award amount, the General award at Annexure-C, which has been quashed by this Court would revive.
5) Liberty is reserved to Special Land Acquisition Officer, KIADB to withdraw the amount, if deposited before the Civil Court pursuant to General award.
Sd/-
JUDGE
HA/-
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!