Wednesday, 06, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Sri. H. Babu Jagadish vs Sri. N.S. Kantharaj
2021 Latest Caselaw 6398 Kant

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 6398 Kant
Judgement Date : 17 December, 2021

Karnataka High Court
Sri. H. Babu Jagadish vs Sri. N.S. Kantharaj on 17 December, 2021
Bench: V Srishananda
                         1



IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

  DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2021

                     BEFORE

      THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. SRISHANANDA

   CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO. 794/2019
                    C/W
   CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO. 531/2019

IN CRL.RP 794/2019

BETWEEN

SRI. H. BABU JAGADISH
SON OF H.HANUMANTHAIAH,
AGED 50 YEARS,
RESIDING AT NO.630
NEW KANTHRAJ URS ROAD
THONACHIKOPPAL 4TH STAGE
10TH MAIN, MYSORE - 570 009.
                                    ...PETITIONER
(BY SRI RUPESH KUMAR S, ADVOCATE)

AND

SRI. N.S. KANTHARAJ
SON OF N.SHANTHARAM,
AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS,
M/S SRI SWAGATH ENTERPRISES,
NO.282/1, 1ST FLOOR,
LAKSHMI VILAS ROAD,
MYSORE - 570 002.
                                    ...RESPONDENT
                         2


(BY SRI VEERESH M. UPPIN, ADVOCATE)

     THIS CRL.RP IS FILED U/S.397 R/W 401 CR.P.C
PRAYING TO SET MODIFY THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT
DATED    14.10.2016  PASSED   BY   THE   JUDICIAL
MAGISTRATE FIRST CLASS (IV COURT) AT MYSURU IN
C.C. NO.741/2015 PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-A AND THE
JUDGMENT DATED 29.01.2019 PASSED BY THE VII ADDL.
SESSIONS JUDGE, MYSURU IN CRIMINAL APPEAL
NO.224/2016 PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-B BY ENHANCING
THE SENTENCE OF IMPRISONMENT AND COMPENSATION
AMOUNT AWARDED TO THE TUNE OF DOUBLE THE
CHEQUE AMOUNT.

IN CRL.RP 531/2019

BETWEEN

SRI N S KANTHARAJ
S/O SRI. N. SHANTHARAM
AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS
M/S SRI SWAGATH ENTERPRISES,
NO.282/1, 1ST FLOOR,
LAXMI VILAS ROAD,
MYSURU 570 024.
                                      ...PETITIONER

(BY SRI VEERESH M. UPPIN FOR SRI CHANDRANATH
ARIGA K, ADVOCATES)

AND

SRI H BABU JAGADISH
S/O SRI. HANUMANTHAIAH
AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS
NO.630, NEW KANTHARAJ URS ROAD,
THONCHIKOPPAL 4TH STAGE,
                             3

10TH MAIN,
MYSURU - 570002.
                                            ...RESPONDENT
(BY SRI RUPESH KUMAR.S, ADVOCATE)

     THIS CRL.RP IS FILED U/S.397 R/W 401 CR.P.C
PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT DATED
29.01.2019 PASSED BY THE VII ADDITIONAL SESSIONS
JUDGE, MYSURU, REJECTING THE CRL.A.NO.221/2016
AND SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND ORDER OF
SENTENCE DATED 14.10.2016 PASSED BY THE IV J.M.F.C.,
MYSURU IN C.C.NO.741/2015 AND ALLOW THIS CRL.RP.

     THESE CRIMINAL REVISION PETITIONS COMING ON
FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE
FOLLOWING:-

                         ORDER

Parties are present before the Court in both the cases.

2. Joint memo duly signed by the parties with their

respective counsel is filed before the Court and the same

reads as under:

"JOINT MEMO

The Petitioner and the Respondent respectfully submits as under:

The Petitioner and the Respondent have amicably come to a settlement to end all the disputes arising out of the above case on the following terms:

a. The Petitioner has agreed to settle the above case by making the Payment of Rs.4,21,000/- (Rupees Four Lakhs Twenty One Thousand Only) to the respondent in the following manner:

i. The Petitioner has deposited a sum of Rs.3,00,000/- before the JMFC IV Court, Mysore. The Respondent may be permitted to withdraw the same.

ii. The Petitioner under takes to pay the remaining amount of Rs.1,21,000/- (Rupees One Lakh Twenty One Thousand) on or before 20.1.2022.

The Parties have henceforth have agreed to the aforesaid terms.

WHEREFORE, the Petitioner and the Respondent Jointly pray this Hon'ble Court to pass appropriate orders in terms of this joint memo".

3. The contents of the Joint Memo is read over and

explained to the parties, which depict true terms of

settlement. Hence, there is no impediment for this court

to dispose of the Revision Petitions. Accordingly, pass the

following:

ORDER

(i) Both the Criminal Revision Petitions are disposed of in terms of the Joint Memo.

(ii) It is made clear that if the instalment amount is not paid, as agreed to in the Joint Memo, the order of the Trial Court automatically restored.

(iii) The respondent/complainant Sri H. Babu Jagadish in CRL.RP No.531/2019 is permitted to withdraw the amount in deposit after due identification.

(iv) If the entire instalment amounts are paid, Sri N.S. Kantharaj, Revision Petitioner/accused stands acquitted of the charges levelled against him.

      (v)     Ordered accordingly.




                                                   Sd/-
                                                 JUDGE

KA*
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter