Saturday, 09, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Sri J N Madhusudhan vs Sri R L Narayanaswamy
2021 Latest Caselaw 6391 Kant

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 6391 Kant
Judgement Date : 17 December, 2021

Karnataka High Court
Sri J N Madhusudhan vs Sri R L Narayanaswamy on 17 December, 2021
Bench: Sreenivas Harish Kumar
                             1




IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

      DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2021

                         BEFORE

 THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SREENIVAS HARISH KUMAR

        CRIMINAL PETITION No.9179 OF 2021


BETWEEN

Sri J.N.Madhusudhan,
S/o Narasimhamurthy,
Aged about 37 years,
Residing at No.17, Srinidhi Layout,
Konanakunte, Kanakapura Main Road,
Bengaluru-560062.
                                         ...Petitioner
(By Sri Vijay Shetty B., Advocate)

AND

1.    Sri R.L.Narayanaswamy,
      S/o Late Chikkamuniswamy,
      Since dead by his LRs.,

1(a) Devamma,
     W/o Late Sri R.L.Narayanaswamay,
     Aged about 65 years,
     Residing at J.J.Colony,
     Railway Station Road,
     Ward No.21, Chintamani Town,
     Chickaballapur District-563125.

1(b) Manjuala,
     D/o Late Sri R.L.Narayanaswamy
     W/o Shankara
                              2




     Aged about 45 years,
     Residing at J.J.Colony,
     Railway Station Road,
     Ward No.21, Chintamani Town,
     Chickaballapur District-563125.

1(c) Rajesh,
     S/o Late Sri R.L.Narayanaswamy,
     Aged about 40 years,
     Residing at J.J.Colony,
     Railway Station Road,
     Ward No.21, Chintamani Town,
     Chickaballapur District-563125.

1(d) Narasimha,
     S/o Late Sri R.L.Narayanaswamy &
     Yerramma (Second Wife),
     Aged about 40 years,
     Residing at J.J.Colony,
     Railway Station Road,
     Ward No.21, Chintamani Town,
     Chickaballapur District-563125.

1(e) Rajamma,
     D/o Late Sri R.L.Narayanaswamy &
     Yerramma (Second Wife),
     W/o Ramesh
     Aged about 35 years,
     Residing at J.J.Colony,
     Railway Station Road,
     Ward No.21, Chintamani Town,
     Chickaballapur District-563125.
                                            ...Respondents


     This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 482
Cr.P.C., praying to quash the order passed by the Principal
Civil Judge and JMFC, Chintamani in C.C.No.200/2019
                                  3




dated 16.11.2021 in not allowing the accused herein to
defend his case by virtue of cross-examination of PW1 and
by way of leading his defence evidence by ordering that as
per the order of the Hon'ble High Court of Karnataka in
Crl.P.No.462/2020 the accused have no right to continued
the defend the proceedings. Hence, the cross of PW1 taken
as nil.


       This Criminal Petition coming on for admission , this
day, the Court made the following:


                           ORDER

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner.

The petitioner has sought to quash the order of the

Prl. Civil Judge and JMFC, Chintamani in

C.C.No.200/2019 in not allowing him to cross-

examining PW.1.

2. Under Section 143A Cr.P.C., the petitioner,

who is accused in a proceeding under section 138 of

N.I.Act was directed to pay 20% of the cheque

amount to the complainant by way of compensation.

Since he failed to make the payment, it appears that

proceeding under section 421 Cr.P.C. has been

initiated and at the same time, the petitioner was

denied the right of cross-examining PW-1 for not

obeying the directions of the trial court. His defence

was struck off. Now it is submitted that the matter

has been posted for pronouncement of judgment.

3. If the accused fails to make payment of the

compensation amount in accordance with section

143A of N.I.Act, action under section 421 of N.I.Act

can be initiated, but at the same time the court has

got every right to strike off the defence. In this view,

if the petitioner is denied of the opportunity of cross-

examining PW.1, there is no infirmity in the said

order. Now the case is posted for judgment. At this

stage there cannot be interference under section 482

Cr.P.C. for recalling the order dated 16.11.2021 in

order to give an opportunity to cross examine PW.1.

In case, he is convicted and if he prefers an appeal,

he can take up all these grounds in the appeal.

Petition is dismissed.

In view of disposal of the petition, I.A.1/2021 is

also disposed of.

SD/-

JUDGE

sd

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter