Tuesday, 12, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Kaila Yadav @ Sandeep Jee @ Sandeep Yadav vs The State Of Jharkhand ... ...Opp. ...
2026 Latest Caselaw 1371 Jhar

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 1371 Jhar
Judgement Date : 19 February, 2026

[Cites 2, Cited by 0]

Jharkhand High Court

Kaila Yadav @ Sandeep Jee @ Sandeep Yadav vs The State Of Jharkhand ... ...Opp. ... on 19 February, 2026

Author: Rajesh Kumar
Bench: Rajesh Kumar
                                                                                 2026:JHHC:4930
             IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
                              B.A. No.11407 of 2025
             Kaila Yadav @ Sandeep Jee @ Sandeep Yadav, aged about 35 years, Son of
             Bhagi Yadav, Resident of village Hedum, P.O.- Dwarika, P.S. Panki, District
             Palamau / Jharkhand.                     ...     ...Petitioner(s)/Applicant(s)
                                          Versus
             The State of Jharkhand                   ...       ...Opp. Party(s)
                                            ---

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR

---

For the Petitioner(s)/Applicant(s) : Mr. Naveen Kumar Jaiswal, Adv.

             For the State                       : Mr. A.K. Pathak, A.P.P.
                                            ---
03/19.02.2026:         Heard the parties.

2. The applicant, who is in custody since 24.12.2024, has approached this Court for grant of regular bail in connection with Manika P.S. Case No.80 of 2024, corresponding to G.R. No.193 of 2025, registered for the offence under Sections 25(1-B) (a), 26 of Arms Act and Section 17 of CLA Act, pending in the Court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Latehar.

3. Innocence has been claimed and participation in the trial has been assured. On the above basis, prayer for bail has been made.

4. It is 3rd attempt. Earlier bail application of the applicant has been rejected twice on merit by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court. From the report called for, it appears that already five witnesses have examined.

5. Considering the above facts, I am not inclined to reconsider the prayer for bail of the applicant at this stage. Accordingly, the prayer for bail of the applicant(s) stands rejected.

(Rajesh Kumar, J.) February 19th, 2026 Ravi-Chandan/-

Uploaded

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter