Wednesday, 13, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Sunil Sardar Aged About 52 Years Son Of ... vs The State Of Jharkhand ....... ...... ...
2025 Latest Caselaw 6060 Jhar

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 6060 Jhar
Judgement Date : 23 September, 2025

Jharkhand High Court

Sunil Sardar Aged About 52 Years Son Of ... vs The State Of Jharkhand ....... ...... ... on 23 September, 2025

Author: Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
Bench: Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
                 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI
                           Cr. Revision No. 856 of 2025
                                         ----

Sunil Sardar aged about 52 years son of Late Magan Sardar, resident of Village Khapparsai, PO Chaibasa, PS Chaibasa Muffasil, District West Singhbhum, Jharkhand ...... .... .... Petitioner(s)

-- Versus --

The State of Jharkhand ....... ...... .... Opp.Party

----

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI

---

For the Petitioner(s) :- Ms Saman Ahmad, Advocate For the State :- Mr. Rakesh Kumar Sinha, Advocate

----

4/23.09.2025 I.A. No.10472 of 2025 has been filed for condonation of delay of 327

days occurred in filing the instant criminal revision petition.

2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that such

delay has occurred as the petitioner has not been able to engage any lawyer

and lastly the matter has come to the Jharkhand High Court Legal Services

Committee and the Jharkhand High Court Legal Services Committee has

appointed her and thereafter the present criminal revision petition has been

filed. She further submits that in view of that, such delay has occurred.

3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent State has got no

serious objection if the said delay is condoned.

4. For the reasons assigned in the petition and further considering the

submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, appointed by the

Jharkhand High Court Legal Services Committee, the Court finds that sufficient

grounds have been made out for condonation of such delay.

5. Accordingly, the delay of 327 days occurred in filing the instant criminal

revision petition is, hereby, condoned.

6. I.A. No.10472 of 2025 filed for condonation of delay of 327 days

occurred in filing the instant criminal revision petition is, hereby, allowed and

disposed of.

7. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner further submits

that learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Chaibasa in G.R. Case No.629

--1-- Cr. Revision No. 856 of 2025 of 2017, corresponding to Mufassil P.S. Case No.136 of 2017 has been pleased

to convict the petitioner under section 411/34 of the IPC and sentenced for R.I.

for 2 years and fine of Rs.5,000/- and in default of fine, further undergo SI for

one month by the judgment dated 19.12.2023. She then submits that against

the said judgment, the petitioner has preferred Appeal being Cr. Appeal No.5 of

2024 and learned Sessions Judge has been pleased to set-aside the conviction

under section 411 /34 of the IPC and convicted the petitioner to undergo

charge under section 379 /34 of the IPC and awarded sentence to undergo RI

for one year and to pay fine of Rs.30,000/- and in default of payment of fine,

further SI for one month. In the aforesaid background, she then submits that

the petitioner has already remained in custody for more than one year and that

has been disclosed in paragraph no.7 and 8 of the I.A. petition.

8. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent State also

accepts the said submission so far as custody period of petitioner is concerned.

9. Considering that the petitioner has already undergone custody for more

than the sentence awarded by the learned Sessions Judge, and in that view of

the matter, the petitioner, above named, is hereby, directed to be released on

bail forthwith, on such terms and conditions as learned court may deem fit and

proper, to the satisfaction of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Chaibasa in

connection with G.R. Case No.629 of 2017, corresponding to Mufassil P.S. Case

No.136 of 2017.

10. If the petitioner will not be able to furnish proper sureties, then the

petitioner will be released on his personal bond.

11. Let this order be communicated to the learned court concerned in course

of the day by the Registry of this Court.

12. I.A. 12662 of 2025 filed for grant of bail is allowed and disposed of.

13. Call for the Trial Court Records.


                                   ( Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.)
Dated :23rd Sept., 2025
SI/

                                   --2--         Cr. Revision No. 856 of 2025
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter