Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 6640 Jhar
Judgement Date : 31 October, 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
M. A. No.460 of 2023
Anika Devi @ Anirka Devi & Ors. .... .. ... Appellant(s)
Versus
Awadhesh Kumar Singh & Ors. .. ... ...Respondent(s)
...........
CORAM :HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GAUTAM KUMAR CHOUDHARY .........
For the Appellant (s) : M/s Chetna Nandini, Advocate Avinash Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent(s) :
......
04/ 31.10.2025. I. A. No.9847 of 2025.
Heard, learned counsel for the appellants on the aforesaid I.A. filed for ignoring the defect No.08 which pertains to the name of appellant No.2 having not been mentioned in the cause title of the impugned order/judgment.
It has been submitted by learned counsel for the appellants that appellant No.2 [Nikhil Kumar Singh, aged about 07 years] had not taken birth at the time of filing of claim case, therefore, his name did not find place in the cause title of the judgment and Award passed by learned Tribunal.
Accordingly, prayer made in the instant I.A. is allowed and defect No.08 as pointed out by the office is ignored.
The aforesaid I.A. stands allowed.
List this case under the appropriate heading.
(Gautam Kumar Choudhary, J.)
Sandeep/-
Uploaded 31.10.2025.
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!