Saturday, 09, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Mahaveera Transport Pvt. Ltd vs Jahir Uddin
2025 Latest Caselaw 7546 Jhar

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 7546 Jhar
Judgement Date : 5 December, 2025

[Cites 2, Cited by 0]

Jharkhand High Court

Mahaveera Transport Pvt. Ltd vs Jahir Uddin on 5 December, 2025

Author: Gautam Kumar Choudhary
Bench: Gautam Kumar Choudhary
                                                            2025:JHHC:36617



IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
            M. A. No. 385 of 2025

Mahaveera Transport Pvt. Ltd., Opp. Hero Honda Company Dharuhera, Dist.-
Rewari, Haryana through its Managing Director namely Ravinder Kumar Jain
having registered office at C-1/14, 2nd Floor, Prashant Vihar, P.O.-Rohini, P.S.-
Prashant Vihar, Dist.-North West Delhi
                                                 ....   ....       Appellant
                             Versus
1. Jahir Uddin, S/o Late Nasiruddin
2. Mehru Nisha, W/o Jahir Uddin, Both are R/o Village-Bhandarwa,
  P.O.-Karma, P.S.-Koderma, Dist.-Koderma, Jharkhand
3. Divisional Manager, United India Insurance Co. Ltd. Prabhu Niwas
  Market, 2nd Floor, Annada Chowk, P.O. & P.S.-Sadar, Hazaribag, Jharkhand
4. Bhuter Kamiljulla Hussain, S/o Kamiljulla Hussain, At-MIDC, Murbad,
  P.O.-Murbad, P.S.-Marhma Gate Police Centre, Dist.-Thane, Maharashtra
                                                 ...      ....      Respondents

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GAUTAM KUMAR CHOUDHARY

For the Appellant               : Mr. Robin Kumar, Advocate
For Respondent-Insurance Co.    : Mr. Manish Kumar, Advocate
                          -----

Oral Order 04 / Dated : 05.12.2025

1. The owner of the vehicle is in appeal against the judgment and award of compensation in Claim Case No. 56 of 2020, whereby and whereunder compensation under Section 166 of the M.V. Act has been awarded in favour of the claimants fixing liability to pay the amount on the owner of the vehicle.

2. The finding of facts with regard to the accidental death of Jawed Ansari in motor vehicle accident while he was employed as helper in lorry no. HR-47B-5853 is not under challenge.

3. The main ground for this appeal is that the vehicle was under insurance cover of United India Insurance Co. Ltd. by policy of insurance (Ext.X) marked for identification by the learned Tribunal.

4. It is argued by the learned counsel on behalf of the appellant that as per the Insurance policy it was a package policy which covers the driver and cleaner of the vehicle.

5. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the appellant that learned Tribunal has committed an error of record while stating at page no. 12 of the impugned award that the premium of Rs. 150/- was paid for covering insurance of driver and no amount was paid for helper/cleaner.

6. A bare perusal of Ext. X will demonstrate that it was a package policy 2025:JHHC:36617

and covered the cleaner of the vehicle. Under Section 7 of Indian Motor Tariff Endorsement (IMT-28), the package policy covers legal liability to pay driver and/or conductor and/or cleaner employed in connection with the operation of insured vehicle.

7. The main issue before this Court in the instant appeal is whether the deceased, who was the cleaner working in the said offending Lorry/truck, was under the insurance cover as per the policy of the insurance. Reliance in this regard is placed on the Indian Motor Tariff Endorsement (IMT-28) which specifically provides that the legal liability to pay driver and/or conductor and /or cleaner employed in connection of operation of insured vehicle is covered, in consideration of an additional premium of Rs.25/-, notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in the policy.

8. From perusal of the policy of insurance, it appears that Rs.150/- was paid as premium. In view of the IMT-28 mere omission to mention the cleaner in the policy will not disentitle the claimants, as premium had already been paid covering the risk of the cleaner.

9. In this view of the matter, the impugned order, whereby and whereunder, the Insurance Company has been exempted from the liability to pay compensation is not sustainable and is accordingly, set aside. This Misc. Appeal is allowed. Pending I.A., if any, stands disposed of. The Insurance Company is directed to satisfy the award and pay the compensation amount to the claimants within a period of two months from the date of the order.

Statutory amount deposited at the time of filing of appeal be returned to the appellant.

(Gautam Kumar Choudhary, J.) AKT/Satendra Uploaded 08.12.2025

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter