Friday, 08, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Shailesh Kumar vs The State Of Jharkhand
2025 Latest Caselaw 2347 Jhar

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 2347 Jhar
Judgement Date : 14 August, 2025

Jharkhand High Court

Shailesh Kumar vs The State Of Jharkhand on 14 August, 2025

Author: Sujit Narayan Prasad
Bench: Sujit Narayan Prasad
                                                  2025:JHHC:23683-DB




 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
           W.P.(C) No.1968 of 2025
                                   ------

Shailesh Kumar, aged about 45 years, Son of Late Saryu Singh, Resident of House no.09, Sundarlal Mishra Road, Near Kali Mandir, Caslair Town, P.O., P.S. Deoghar & District Deoghar .... .... Petitioner Versus

1. The State of Jharkhand.

2. The Secretary, Department of Mines and Geology, Government of Jharkhand, Project Building, P.O. & P.S. -Dhurwa, District - Ranchi.

3. The Director Mines, Department of Mines and Geology, Government of Jharkhand, Nepal House, P.O. & P.S. Doranda, District - Ranchi.

4. The Deputy Commissioner, Deoghar, having its office at District Collectorate Deoghar, P.O., P.S. Deoghar & District Deoghar.

5. The District Mining Officer Deoghar, having its office at District Collectorate Deoghar, P.O., P.S. Deoghar & District Deoghar.

6. The Assistant Mining Officer, Deoghar, having its office at District Collectorate Deoghar, P.O., P.S. Deoghar & District Deoghar.

..... .... Respondents

CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR RAI

------

For the Petitioner : Ms. Tanya Singh, Advocate For the State : Mr. Shray Mishra, AC to AG

------

05/Dated: 14.08.2025

1. The instant writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the

Constitution of India seeking therein for the following reliefs: -

(i) For issuance of a writ of certiorari quashing the letter contained in memo no. 444 dated 10.08.2020 (Annexure-3) issued under the pen and signature of District Mining Officer, Deoghar whereby and whereunder an erroneous decision has been taken to reject the petitioner's application for renewal of mining lease pertaining to Bargunia Stone Mines situated at Plot no. 446 at Village Bargunia,

2025:JHHC:23683-DB

District Deoghar that too by wrongly relying upon Rule 9 (1) (chha) of the Jharkhand Minor Mineral Concession Rules 2004 which is wholly illegal and unlawful in view of the fact that Rule 9 (1) (chha) no where stipulates that renewal of mining lease is impermissible instead it merely states that the period of approved/renewed mining lease on government area and Raiyati area of more than 05.00 hectare area, if their approval/renewal period is after 31st March, 2020, then their period will remain valid till the period of their approval/ renewal.

(ii) For directing the respondents particularly respondent no. 4 to 6 to renew the mining lease of the petitioner in relation to Bargunia Stone Mines situated at Plot no. 446 at Village Bargunia, P.O., P.S. Madhupur & District Deoghar in furtherance to the mining license already granted to the petitioner and also taking into consideration Rule 23 of the Jharkhand Minor Mineral Concession Rules 2004.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the authority

concerned while passing the impugned order dated 10.08.2020 has

not appreciated the fact in right perspective.

3. Mr. Shray Mishra, learned AC to AG appearing for the respondent-

State that the similar issue has already been decided by the

Coordinate Bench of this Court in W.P.(C) No.3560 of 2025 on

08.08.2025.

4. Submission therefore has been made that the present writ petition

2025:JHHC:23683-DB

may also be disposed of in terms of the said judgment passed by

this Court.

5. We have considered the arguments advanced on behalf of the

parties and perused the judgment passed by the Coordinate

Bench of this Court dated 08.08.2025.

6. We, after going through the prayer and pleadings made in the writ

petition, as also, the judgment dated 08.08.2025 passed in

W.P.(C) No.3560 of 2025, have found that the issue, which is the

subject matter of the present writ petition, has already been

decided by the Coordinate Bench of this Court in the aforesaid

judgment.

7. Accordingly, the instant writ petition is dismissed, in terms of the

judgment dated 08.08.2025 passed in W.P.(C) No.3560 of 2025.

8. In consequence thereof, pending interlocutory application(s), if

any, stands disposed of.

(Sujit Narayan Prasad, J.)

(Arun Kumar Rai, J.)

Rohit/-

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter