Wednesday, 13, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

M/S Esl Steel Limited (Earlier Known As ... vs Principal Chief Commissioner Of Income ...
2024 Latest Caselaw 9567 Jhar

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 9567 Jhar
Judgement Date : 24 September, 2024

Jharkhand High Court

M/S Esl Steel Limited (Earlier Known As ... vs Principal Chief Commissioner Of Income ... on 24 September, 2024

 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
            W.P.(T) No.5141 of 2024
                       -----

M/s ESL Steel Limited (earlier known as Electrosteel Steels Limited), a Company registered under the Companies Act, 1956, having its registered office and principal place of business at Vill-Siyaljori, P.O. Jogidih, Opp-Bangaria, P.S. Chandankiary, Bokaro, through its Deputy General Manager (Accounts) Rajesh Kumar Pandey, Aged about 52 years, Son of Late Shambhu Pandey, Resident of Vastu Vihar-4, Phase- 2, Road No. 5, P.O. Chas, P.S. Chas, District Bokaro-827 013. ... ... Petitioner Versus

1. Principal Chief Commissioner of Income Tax, having its Office at Central Revenue Building, (Annexee), Beer Chand Patel Marg, P.O. G.P.O., P.S. Kotwali, Town Patna, District Patna-800 001.

2. Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, having its Office at Central Revenue Building, 5A, Main Road, Ranchi, P.O. G.P.O., P.S. Kotwali, Ranchi-834 001.

3. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, TDS Circle, having its Office at Central Revenue Building (Annexee), 5A, Main Road, Ranchi, P.O. G.P.O., P.S. Kotwali, Ranchi- 834 001.

4. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, TDS Circle, having its Office at Central Revenue Building (Annexee), 5A, Main Road, Ranchi, P.O. G.P.O., P.S. Kotwali, Ranchi-834 001. ... ... Respondents With

M/s ESL Steel Limited (earlier known as Electrosteel Steels Limited), a Company registered under the Companies Act, 1956, having its registered office and principal place of business at Vill-Siyaljori, P.O. Jogidih, Opp-Bangaria, P.S. Chandankiary, Bokaro, through its Deputy General Manager (Accounts) Rajesh Kumar Pandey, Aged about 52 years, Son of Late Shambhu Pandey, Resident of Vastu Vihar-4, Phase- 2, Road No. 5, P.O. Chas, P.S. Chas, District Bokaro-827 013. ... ... Petitioner Versus

1. Principal Chief Commissioner of Income Tax, having its Office at Central Revenue Building, (Annexee), Beer Chand Patel Marg, P.O. G.P.O., P.S. Kotwali, Town Patna, District Patna-800 001.

2. Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, having its Office at Central Revenue Building, 5A, Main Road, Ranchi, P.O. G.P.O., P.S. Kotwali, Ranchi-834 001.

3. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, TDS Circle, having its Office at Central Revenue Building (Annexee), 5A, Main Road, Ranchi, P.O. G.P.O., P.S. Kotwali, Ranchi- 834 001.

4. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, TDS Circle, having its Office at Central Revenue Building (Annexee), 5A, Main Road, Ranchi, P.O. G.P.O., P.S. Kotwali, Ranchi-834 001. ... ... Respondents With

M/s ESL Steel Limited (earlier known as Electrosteel Steels Limited), a Company registered under the Companies Act, 1956, having its registered office and principal place of business at Vill-Siyaljori, P.O. Jogidih, Opp-Bangaria, P.S. Chandankiary, Bokaro, through its Deputy General Manager (Accounts) Rajesh Kumar Pandey, Aged about 52 years, Son of Late Shambhu Pandey, Resident of Vastu Vihar-4, Phase- 2, Road No. 5, P.O. Chas, P.S. Chas, District Bokaro-827 013. ... ... Petitioner Versus

1. Principal Chief Commissioner of Income Tax, having its Office at Central Revenue Building, (Annexee), Beer Chand Patel Marg, P.O. G.P.O., P.S. Kotwali, Town Patna, District Patna-800 001.

2. Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, having its Office at Central Revenue Building, 5A, Main Road, Ranchi, P.O. G.P.O., P.S. Kotwali, Ranchi-834 001.

3. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, TDS Circle, having its Office at Central Revenue Building (Annexee), 5A, Main Road, Ranchi, P.O. G.P.O., P.S. Kotwali, Ranchi- 834 001.

4. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, TDS Circle, having its Office at Central Revenue Building (Annexee), 5A, Main Road, Ranchi, P.O. G.P.O., P.S. Kotwali, Ranchi-834 001. ... ... Respondents With

M/s ESL Steel Limited (earlier known as Electrosteel Steels Limited), a Company registered under the Companies Act, 1956, having its registered office and principal place of business at Vill-Siyaljori, P.O. Jogidih, Opp-Bangaria, P.S. Chandankiary, Bokaro, through its Deputy General Manager (Accounts) Rajesh Kumar Pandey, Aged about 52 years, Son of Late Shambhu Pandey, Resident of Vastu Vihar-4, Phase- 2, Road No. 5, P.O. Chas, P.S. Chas, District Bokaro-827 013. ... ... Petitioner Versus

1. Principal Chief Commissioner of Income Tax, having its Office at Central Revenue Building, (Annexee), Beer Chand Patel Marg, P.O. G.P.O., P.S. Kotwali, Town Patna, District Patna-800 001.

2. Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, having its Office at Central Revenue Building, 5A, Main Road, Ranchi, P.O. G.P.O., P.S. Kotwali, Ranchi-834 001.

3. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, TDS Circle, having its Office at Central Revenue Building (Annexee), 5A, Main Road, Ranchi, P.O. G.P.O., P.S. Kotwali, Ranchi- 834 001.

4. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, TDS Circle, having its Office at Central Revenue Building (Annexee), 5A, Main Road, Ranchi, P.O. G.P.O., P.S. Kotwali, Ranchi-834 001. ... ... Respondents With

M/s ESL Steel Limited (earlier known as Electrosteel Steels Limited), a Company registered under the Companies Act, 1956, having its registered office and principal place of business at Vill-Siyaljori, P.O. Jogidih, Opp-Bangaria, P.S. Chandankiary, Bokaro, through its Deputy General Manager (Accounts) Rajesh Kumar Pandey, Aged about 52 years, Son of Late Shambhu Pandey, Resident of Vastu Vihar-4, Phase- 2, Road No. 5, P.O. Chas, P.S. Chas, District Bokaro-827 013. ... ... Petitioner Versus

1. Principal Chief Commissioner of Income Tax, having its Office at Central Revenue Building, (Annexee), Beer Chand Patel Marg, P.O. G.P.O., P.S. Kotwali, Town Patna, District Patna-800 001.

2. Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, having its Office at Central Revenue Building, 5A, Main Road, Ranchi, P.O. G.P.O., P.S. Kotwali, Ranchi-834 001.

3. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, TDS Circle, having its Office at Central Revenue Building (Annexee), 5A, Main Road, Ranchi, P.O. G.P.O., P.S. Kotwali, Ranchi- 834 001.

4. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, TDS Circle, having its Office at Central Revenue Building (Annexee), 5A, Main Road, Ranchi, P.O. G.P.O., P.S. Kotwali, Ranchi-834 001. ... ... Respondents

-------

CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR RAI

-------

For the Petitioner : Mr. Biren Poddar, Sr. Advocate : Mr. Piyush Poddar, Advocate

: Mr. Deepak Sinha, Advocate : Mr. Manav Poddar, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. Kumar Vaibhav, Sr. Standing Counsel, ITD

------

                              th
Order No. 02/Dated 24              September, 2024

1. All these writ petitions have been prayed to be

heard together since common issues are involved.

2. These writ petitions have been filed under Article

226 of the Constitution of India praying therein for

following directions :-

a) For quashing and setting aside the Notice of Demand dated 19.03.2018 (Annexure-2) issued by the Respondent No. 3, whereby the Petitioner has been directed to pay the assessed amount of alleged tax liability for Rs. 4,33,030/-

for the Financial Year 2012-13, in pursuance of the Order dated 19.03.2018 (Annexure-1) passed by the Respondent No. 3, under Section 206C of the Income Tax Act, 1961, as the Respondent Department is not entitled to recover the said amount from the Petitioner, in view of the Judgment passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Ghanshyam Mishra and Sons Private Ltd. Vrs. Edelweiss Asset Reconstruction Company Ltd. reported in (2021) 9 SCC 657, wherein the Petitioner is also one of the Appellants.

b) For quashing and setting aside the ex-parte Appellate Order dated 19.06.2024 (Annexure-5) passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Kolkata under Section 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, whereby the appeal dated 03.04.2018 (Annexure-3 Series) filed by the Petitioner challenging the Order dated 19.03.2018 (Annexure-1) passed by the Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, TDS Circle, Ranchi (Respondent No. 3), under Section 206C of the Income Tax Act, 1961, for the Financial Year 2012-13, has been dismissed and the tax

liability of Rs. 4,33,030/- created by him, has been confirmed against the Petitioner.

c) For quashing and setting aside the Order dated 19.03.2018 (Annexure-1) passed by the Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, TDS Circle, Ranchi (Respondent No. 3), under Section 206C of the Income Tax Act, 1961, for the Financial Year 2012-13, whereby a tax of Rs. 4,33,030/ has been imposed/levied upon the Petitioner.

a) For quashing and setting aside the Notice of Demand dated 19.03.2018 (Annexure-2) issued by the Respondent No. 3, whereby the Petitioner has been directed to pay the assessed amount of alleged tax liability for Rs.52,99,327/- for the Financial Year 2016-17, in pursuance of the Order dated 19.03.2018 (Annexure-1) passed by the Respondent No. 3, under Section 206C of the Income Tax Act, 1961, as the Respondent Department is not entitled to recover the said amount from the Petitioner, in view of the Judgment passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Ghanshyam Mishra and Sons Private Ltd. Vrs. Edelweiss Asset Reconstruction Company Ltd. reported in (2021) 9 SCC 657, wherein the Petitioner is also one of the Appellants.

b) For quashing and setting aside the ex-parte Appellate Order dated 19.06.2024 (Annexure-5) passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Kolkata under Section 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, whereby the appeal dated 05.04.2018 (Annexure-3 Series) filed by the Petitioner challenging the Order dated 19.03.2018 (Annexure-1) passed by the Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, TDS Circle, Ranchi (Respondent No. 3), under Section 206C of the Income Tax Act, 1961, for the Financial Year 2016-17, has been dismissed and the tax liability of Rs. 52,99,327/- created by him, has been confirmed against the Petitioner.

c) For quashing and setting aside the Order dated 19.03.2018 (Annexure-1) passed by the Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, TDS Circle, Ranchi (Respondent No. 3), under Section 206C of the Income Tax

Act, 1961, for the Financial Year 2016-17, whereby a tax of Rs. 52,99,327/- has been imposed/levied upon the Petitioner.

a) For quashing and setting aside the Notice of Demand dated 19.03.2018 (Annexure-2) issued by the Respondent No. 3, whereby the Petitioner has been directed to pay the assessed amount of alleged tax liability for Rs.17,46,020/- for the Financial Year 2013-14, in pursuance of the Order dated 19.03.2018 (Annexure-1) passed by the Respondent No. 3, under Section 206C of the Income Tax Act, 1961, as the Respondent Department is not entitled to recover the said amount from the Petitioner, in view of the Judgment passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Ghanshyam Mishra and Sons Private Ltd. Vrs. Edelweiss Asset Reconstruction Company Ltd. reported in (2021) 9 SCC 657, wherein the Petitioner is also one of the Appellants.

b) For quashing and setting aside the ex-parte Appellate Order dated 19.06.2024 (Annexure-5) passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Kolkata under Section 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, whereby the appeal dated 04.04.2018 (Annexure-3 Series) filed by the Petitioner challenging the Order dated 19.03.2018 (Annexure-1) passed by the Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, TDS Circle, Ranchi (Respondent No. 3), under Section 206C of the Income Tax Act, 1961, for the Financial Year 2013-14, has been dismissed and the tax liability of Rs. 17,46,020/- created by him, has been confirmed against the Petitioner.

c) For quashing and setting aside the Order dated 19.03.2018 (Annexure-1) passed by the Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, TDS Circle, Ranchi (Respondent No. 3), under Section 206C of the Income Tax Act, 1961, for the Financial Year 2013-14, whereby a tax of Rs. 17,46,020/- has been imposed/levied upon the Petitioner.

a) For quashing and setting aside the Notice of Demand dated 19.03.2018 (Annexure-2) issued by the Respondent

No. 3, whereby the Petitioner has been directed to pay the assessed amount of alleged tax liability for Rs.50,30,722/- for the Financial Year 2015-16, in pursuance of the Order dated 19.03.2018 (Annexure-1) passed by the Respondent No. 3, under Section 206C of the Income Tax Act, 1961, as the Respondent Department is not entitled to recover the said amount from the Petitioner, in view of the Judgment passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Ghanshyam Mishra and Sons Private Ltd. Vrs. Edelweiss Asset Reconstruction Company Ltd. reported in (2021) 9 SCC 657, wherein the Petitioner is also one of the Appellants.

b) For quashing and setting aside the ex-parte Appellate Order dated 19.06.2024 (Annexure-5) passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Kolkata under Section 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, whereby the appeal dated 05.04.2018 (Annexure-3 Series) filed by the Petitioner challenging the Order dated 19.03.2018 (Annexure-1) passed by the Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, TDS Circle, Ranchi (Respondent No. 3), under Section 206C of the Income Tax Act, 1961, for the Financial Year 2015-16, has been dismissed and the tax liability of Rs. 50,30,722/- created by him, has been confirmed against the Petitioner.

c) For quashing and setting aside the Order dated 19.03.2018 (Annexure-1) passed by the Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, TDS Circle, Ranchi (Respondent No. 3), under Section 206C of the Income Tax Act, 1961, for the Financial Year 2015-16, whereby a tax of Rs. 50,30,722/- has been imposed/levied upon the Petitioner.

a) For quashing and setting aside the Notice of Demand dated 19.03.2018 (Annexure-2) issued by the Respondent No. 3, whereby the Petitioner has been directed to pay the assessed amount of alleged tax liability for Rs.18,01,839/- for the Financial Year 2014-15, in pursuance of the Order dated 19.03.2018 (Annexure-1) passed by the Respondent No. 3, under Section 206C of the Income Tax Act, 1961, as the Respondent Department is not entitled to recover the

said amount from the Petitioner, in view of the Judgment passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Ghanshyam Mishra and Sons Private Ltd. Vrs. Edelweiss Asset Reconstruction Company Ltd. reported in (2021) 9 SCC 657, wherein the Petitioner is also one of the Appellants.

b) For quashing and setting aside the ex-parte Appellate Order dated 19.06.2024 (Annexure-5) passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Kolkata under Section 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, whereby the appeal dated 04.04.2018 (Annexure-3 Series) filed by the Petitioner challenging the Order dated 19.03.2018 (Annexure-1) passed by the Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, TDS Circle, Ranchi (Respondent No. 3), under Section 206C of the Income Tax Act, 1961, for the Financial Year 2014-15, has been dismissed and the tax liability of Rs.18,01,839/- created by him, has been confirmed against the Petitioner.

c) For quashing and setting aside the Order dated 19.03.2018 (Annexure-1) passed by the Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, TDS Circle, Ranchi (Respondent No. 3), under Section 206C of the Income Tax Act, 1961, for the Financial Year 2014-15, whereby a tax of Rs.18,01,839/- has been imposed/levied upon the Petitioner."

3. In course of argument, Mr. Biren Poddar, learned

senior counsel assisted by Mr. Deepak Sinha, learned

counsel, has submitted that the authorities have been tried

to be impressed upon by filing application on 17.08.2024

showing applicability of the judgment passed by Hon'ble

Apex Court in the case of Ghanshyam Mishra and Sons

Private Ltd. v. Edelweiss Asset Reconstruction

Company Ltd. reported in (2021) 9 SCC 657, but the

authorities have not passed any order.

4. It has been submitted that suffice will be at this

stage if the direction will be issued upon the competent

authority to take a decision on that, if not already taken.

5. Mr. Kumar Vaibhav, learned counsel appearing for

the Revenue, has submitted that if the application has not

been decided, then the same will be decided in accordance

with law within a reasonable period.

6. Considering the same, without entering into the

merit of the issues, the concerned respondent is hereby

directed to decide the application dated 17.08.2024, if not

already decided, within a period of three weeks from the

date of receipt of copy of the order.

7. Accordingly, the writ petitions stand disposed of.

(Sujit Narayan Prasad, A.C.J.)

(Arun Kumar Rai, J.) Birendra/

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter