Thursday, 14, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Safik Ansari @ Safique Ansari vs The State Of Jharkhand
2024 Latest Caselaw 9993 Jhar

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 9993 Jhar
Judgement Date : 16 October, 2024

Jharkhand High Court

Safik Ansari @ Safique Ansari vs The State Of Jharkhand on 16 October, 2024

Author: Anil Kumar Choudhary

Bench: Anil Kumar Choudhary

                 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
                           Cr.M.P. No. 3177 of 2023


            1. Safik Ansari @ Safique Ansari, aged about 22 years, s/o Yunus
                 Ansari, r/o Village- Ugra, P.O. & P.S.-Senha, Dist.-Lohardaga,
                 Jharkhand
            2. Sahabuddin Ansari, aged about 49 years, s/o Seyakhudin Ansari,
                 r/o Village- Ugra Sarak Toli, P.O. & P.S.-Senha, Dist.-Lohardaga,
                 Jharkhand
                                                     ....                Petitioners


                                        Versus

            The State of Jharkhand
                                                     ....                    Opp. Party

                                        PRESENT

                 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
                                      .....

For the Petitioners : Mr. Sanjeev Kr. Sahay, Advocate For the State : Mr. Sanjay Kr. Srivastava, Addl. P.P.

.....

By the Court:-

1. Heard the parties.

2. This criminal miscellaneous petition has been filed invoking the

jurisdiction of this Court under Section 482 Cr.P.C. with a prayer to

quash and set aside the order dated 24.03.2022 passed in Criminal

Revision No. 17 of 2021 whereby and where under, the learned

Sessions Judge, Lohardaga has dismissed the criminal revision

preferred against the order dated 26.07.2021 passed by learned

A.C.J.M., Lohardaga in Misc. Cr. Application No. 387 of 2021

whereby and where under, the learned A.C.J.M., Lohardaga rejected

the prayer of the petitioner for release of tractor bearing registration

no. JH 08 H-5417 and trailer bearing registration no. JH 08 D-1861

which has been seized in connection with Bhandra P.S. Case No. 08

of 2021 corresponding to G.R. No. 271 of 2021.

3. The brief fact of the case is that consequent upon institution of the

said case, a confiscation proceeding in respect of the said vehicle is

going on vide Confiscation Case No. 1/2021-22 before the Deputy

Commissioner, Lohardaga which as per the supplementary affidavit

dated 27.08.2024 filed by the petitioner is still pending before the

Deputy Commissioner, Lohardaga.

4. Since the confiscation proceeding is pending, the learned Sessions

Judge, Lohardaga has rejected the prayer for release of the vehicle,

by setting aside the order passed by the learned ACJM.

5. Relying upon the judgment of a coordinate Bench of this Court in

the case of Biva Jha vs. State of Jharkhand in Cr.M.P. No. 3095 of

2013 dated 19.12.2013 it is submitted by the learned counsel for the

petitioners that therein it has been mentioned that in the M.M.D.R.

Act there is no provision which prevents the Court from making the

order for release of the vehicle seized in contravention of the

M.M.D.R. Act. Hence, it is submitted that the prayer as prayed for in

this criminal miscellaneous petition be allowed.

6. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor on the other hand opposes

the prayer and submits that the said order of the coordinate Bench

was passed before the Jharkhand Mineral (Prevention of Illegal

Mining, Transportation & Storage) Rules, 2017 came into force and

Rule 11 (v) of the same empowers the Deputy Commissioner for

confiscation of inter alia any vehicle seized. Therefore, the ratio of the

said judgment is not applicable in view of the Jharkhand Mineral

(Prevention of Illegal Mining, Transportation & Storage) Rules, 2017

coming into force. Hence, it is submitted that this criminal

miscellaneous petition being without any merit be dismissed.

7. Having heard the submissions made at the Bar and after going

through the materials in the record, it is pertinent to mention here

that the undisputed fact remains that the confiscation proceeding in

respect of the vehicle in question is going on before the Deputy

Commissioner, Lohardaga. The legality of the said confiscation

proceeding before the Deputy Commissioner is not under challenge

in this criminal miscellaneous petition.

8. Under such circumstances, this Court do not find any illegality in

the order dated 24.03.2022 passed by the learned Sessions Judge,

Lohardaga in Criminal Revision No. 17 of 2021 as also the order

dated 26.07.2021 passed by learned A.C.J.M., Lohardaga in Misc. Cr.

Application No. 387 of 2021 in connection with Bhandra P.S. Case

No. 08 of 2021 corresponding to G.R. No. 271 of 2021.

9. Accordingly, this criminal miscellaneous petition being without

any merit is dismissed.

(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.)

High Court of Jharkhand, Ranchi Dated the 16th October, 2024 AFR/Sonu-Gunjan/-

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter