Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 974 Jhar
Judgement Date : 31 January, 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Cr. Appeal (S.J) No.248 of 2004
Shakuntala Devi ...... Appellant
Versus
The State of Jharkhand ....... Respondent
---------
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRASAD
--------
For the Appellant : Mr. P.P.N. Roy, Sr. Advocate : Ms. Kavita Kumari, Advocoate For the State : Mr. Sardhu Mahto, APP For the CBI : Mr. Nitish Parth Sarthi, A.C to Addl.SGI
-----------
st 11/Dated:31 January, 2024
It appears that learned counsel for the appellant has filed the present case by impleading the State of Jharkhand as respondent in this case instead of C.B.I though the judgment and sentence dated 21.01.2004 has been passed in R.C. Case No.22(A)/95 (R) by the learned Special Judge, C.B.I, Ranchi .
Under the circumstances, learned counsel for the appellant is directed to implead the C.B.I as respondent no.2 in this case.
Mr. Nitish Parth Sarthi, learned A.C to learned Addl. SGI appears on behalf of the C.B.I submitted that Mr. Anil Kumar, learned Addl. SGI will appear in this case on behalf of the C.B.I and prays for supply of the paper book.
Under the circumstances, office is directed to furnish the paper book of this appeal along with all relevant documents to the learned Addl.SGI on payment of cost.
Put up this case after four weeks.
(Sanjay Prasad, J.) Saket/-
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!