Wednesday, 13, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Manish Rahi vs The State Of Jharkhand
2024 Latest Caselaw 760 Jhar

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 760 Jhar
Judgement Date : 22 January, 2024

Jharkhand High Court

Manish Rahi vs The State Of Jharkhand on 22 January, 2024

Author: Rajesh Kumar

Bench: Rajesh Kumar

                                      -1-                       W.P.(Cr.) No.1223 of 2023



    IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
                 W.P.(Cr.) No.1223 of 2023

    Manish Rahi                                        ......        Petitioner
                                  Versus
    1.     The State of Jharkhand
    2.     The Deputy Collector, Ranchi
    3.     The District Mining Officer, Ranchi
                                           .....                Respondents
                                  ---------

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR

---------

For the Petitioner : Mr. Nandan Prasad, Advocate For the State : Mr. Rakesh Kr. Shahi, A.C to SC (L&C)-I

---------

                 nd
03/Dated: 22          January, 2024

1. The present writ petition has been filed for the following reliefs :-

"a.) For issuance of appropriate writ(s)/ order(s)/ direction(s), for quashing the order dated 18.03.2023 (Annexure-3) order passed by the learned Ms. Nutan Ekka, J.M XXII, Ranchi in M.C.A. No.1119/ 2023 arising out of Dasamfall P.S Case no.26/ 2022 which is registered for the offence u/s-4/21 of Mines and Mineral Act, 1957 and under section 4/ 54 of Jharkhand Mines and Mineral Concession Rule and under Sections 7 /11/ 13 Jharkhand Mineral (prevention of illegal mining transportation and storage) Rule 2017 whereby the application for release of the commercial vehicle was filed by the petitioner was disposed off as not maintainable on the ground of initiation of confiscation proceeding being confiscation case no.37 R 28/ 2022-23 has been registered in this regard. In memo no. 104/23 dated 16.02.2023 has been sent to the D.C., Ranchi. And also quashing of the order dated 01.12.2023 (Annexure-4) order passed by the learned Sri A.K Rai Judicial Commissioner, Ranchi in Cr. Revision no.454/ 2023 whereby and where under criminal revision was dismissed stating therein that there is no illegality and infirmity in the impugned order dated 18.03.2023 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate. Now the case is pending before the learned Ms. Nutan Ekka J.M., At Ranchi.

b.) Consequent upon being satisfied for further issuance of an appropriate writ(s)/ order(s)/ direction (s) to the respondent's authorities to immediate and forthwith, vehicle to be released and the confiscation proceeding initiated vide order dated 06.07.2023 bearing confiscation case no.37R28/ 2022-23 (Annexure-5) be quashed and set aside.."

2. It appears that a criminal case has been lodged being Dasamfall P.S Case No.26 of 2022, registered for the offence under Sections 4/ 21 of the Mines and Mineral Act, Rules 4/ 54 of the Jharkhand Minor Minerals Concessions Rules, 2004 and under Sections 7/ 11/ 13 of the Jharkhand Minerals (Prevention of Illegal Mining, Transportation & Storage) Rules.

3. It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the vehicles, in question (bearing registration

Nos.JHOIEA 7895, JH01DQ 6681 & JH01T 7566) have been seized by the police. The petitioner is the registered owner of the commercial vehicle namely, TATA SFC Mini Truck (709) bearing registration No.JH01DQ-6881. The order of confiscation has been passed by the Deputy Commissioner, Ranchi in Confiscation Case No.37R 28/ 2022-23 vide order dated 06.07.2023 (order is impugned in the present criminal writ petition) which is not as per the law and no such power is vested to the Deputy Commissioner.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that as per the mandate of Section 21(4-A) of the Mines and Minerals (Development & Regulations) Act, 1957, only the criminal court taking cognizance of the offence is competent to pass the order of confiscation and the Deputy Commissioner has no such power. In support of his contention, learned counsel for the petitioner has relied upon the judgment dated 27.09.2021, 07.07.2022 and 13.09.2023 passed in W.P.(Cr.) Nos.77 of 2021, 233 of 2022 and 502 of 2023 by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court and has submitted that the said issued has already been settled by this Court.

5. In view of the law declared by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court that the Deputy Commissioner is not a competent authority to pass the order of confiscation. Accordingly, the order dated 06.07.2023 (Annexure-5) passed by the Deputy Commissioner, Ranchi in Confiscation Case No.37R 28/ 2022-23 in connection with Dassamfall P.S. Case No.26 of 2022 is, hereby, quashed and set-aside.

6. Consequently, the matter is remitted back to the learned court below, who has taken cognizance, to pass a fresh order after considering the merit of the case in accordance with law within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt/ production of a copy of this order.

7. Accordingly, the present criminal writ petition stands disposed of.

(Rajesh Kumar, J.) Chandan/-

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter