Saturday, 09, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Hakim Kumar Das vs The State Of Jharkhand
2024 Latest Caselaw 714 Jhar

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 714 Jhar
Judgement Date : 22 January, 2024

Jharkhand High Court

Hakim Kumar Das vs The State Of Jharkhand on 22 January, 2024

Author: Rajesh Shankar

Bench: Rajesh Shankar

                         1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
            W.P.(S) No. 7121 of 2023
                      ---

1. Hakim Kumar Das

2. Manoj Kumar Poddar

3. Mukesh Kumar Dey

4. Ravi Kumar

5. Jaldhar Mandal

6. Heera Lal Rana

7. Shashi Kant Gupta

8. Vinay Kumar Mahto

9. Jatru Mahto ... ... Petitioners Versus

1. The State of Jharkhand

2. The Chief Secretary, Government of Jharkhand, Ranchi

3. The Principal Secretary, Department of Personnel, Administrative Reforms and Rajbhasha, Government of Jharkhand, Ranchi

4. The Principal Secretary, Department of Human Resources Development, Government of Jharkhand, Ranchi

5. The Director, Directorate of Primary Education, Department of Human Resources Development, Government of Jharkhand, Ranchi

6. The Director, Jharkhand Education Project Council, Ranchi

7. The Deputy Commissioner, Dhanbad

8. The Deputy Superintendent of Education, Dhanbad

9. The Deputy Commissioner, Bokaro

10. The Deputy Superintendent of Education, Bokaro

11. The Deputy Commissioner, Khunti

12. The Deputy Superintendent of Education, Khunti

13.The Deputy Commissioner, Sahebganj

14. The Deputy Superintendent of Education, Sahebganj

15. The Deputy Commissioner, Ranchi

16. The Deputy Superintendent of Education, Ranchi

17. The Deputy Commissioner, Pakur

18. The Deputy Superintendent of Education, Pakur

19. The Deputy Commissioner, Seraikella-Kharsawan

20. The Deputy Superintendent of Education, Seraikella-Kharsawan

21.The Deputy Commissioner, East Singhbhum, Jamshedpur

22. The Deputy Superintendent of Education, East Singhbhum, Jamshedpur

23. The Deputy Commissioner, Jamtara

24. The Deputy Superintendent of Education, Jamtara

25. The Deputy Commissioner, Deoghar

26. The Deputy Superintendent of Education, Deoghar

27. The Deputy Commissioner, Dumka

28. The Deputy Superintendent of Education, Dumka

29. The Deputy Commissioner, Godda

30. The Deputy Superintendent of Education, Godda

31. The Deputy Commissioner, Hazaribag

32. The Deputy Superintendent of Education, Hazaribag

33. The Deputy Commissioner, Ramgarh

34. The Deputy Superintendent of Education, Ramgarh

35. The Deputy Commissioner, Giridih

36. The Deputy Superintendent of Education, Giridih

37. The Deputy Commissioner, Koderma

38. The Deputy Superintendent of Education, Koderma

39. The Deputy Commissioner, Chatra,

40. The Deputy Superintendent of Education, Chatra .... ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR For the Petitioners : Mr. Arpan Mishra, Advocate For the Resp. State : Mr. Faisal Allam, A.C. to S.C.(Mines)-III For the Resp.-JEPC : Mr. Krishna Murari, Advocate

-----

Order No. 05 Dated: 22.01.2024

Office is directed to correct the seriatim of the

respondents in the cause title of the writ petition by deleting the

respondent nos. 11 and 12.

2. The petitioners, who are presently the para-teachers,

have prayed for issuance of direction upon the respondents to

call them for counselling for their appointment on the post of

Inter Trained Teacher (Class I to V) in respective districts under

non-para category as per their respective merit, since, according

to them, they have scored more marks than the candidates who

being para teachers had applied under non-para category and

were called for counselling held on 3rd June, 2019 pursuant to

the order dated 11th May, 2018 passed by the learned Division

Bench in L.P.A. No.186 of 2017 with L.P.A. No.199 of 2017.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the

respondent authorities may be directed to accommodate the

petitioners in the counselling process to be conducted for the

post of Inter Trained Teacher (Class I to V) in the light of

judgment dated 16.02.2022 passed by this Court in W.P.(S) No.

2378 of 2019 [Paras Nath Mandal Vs. The State of Jharkhand &

Ors.] and other analogous matters as well as the order dated

15.09.2023 passed in L.P.A No. 203 of 2022 [The State of

Jharkhand & Ors. Vs. Paras Nath Mandal] and other analogous

cases, in respective districts keeping in view that they had

applied against the vacancies of Inter Trained Teacher (Class-I

to V) in different districts in the year 2015 under para categories

but were not called for counselling, however, the candidates

who being para teachers had applied under non-para category

and had obtained lesser marks than the petitioners, were called

and allowed to participate in the counselling held on

03.06.2019.

4. It is further submitted by learned counsel for the

petitioners that similar issue came up for consideration before

this Court in W.P.(S) No. 2378 of 2019 [Paras Nath Mandal Vs.

The State of Jharkhand & Ors.] and other analogous cases,

which were allowed vide order dated 16.02.2022 with following

directions:

"18. As a cumulative effect of the aforesaid observations, rules, guidelines, legal propositions and judicial pronouncements, I hereby direct the respondents to initiate process of counseling for the present petitioners by way of last opportunity, since they have obtained more marks than the last selected candidates in the merit list. The petitioners shall approach the Deputy Commissioners of the concerned Districts, as early as possible, preferably, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and thereafter, the Deputy Commissioner shall initiate the process of counseling after giving proper notice to the petitioners by way of Press Communique, advertising the notice in the local newspaper having the wide circulation in the concerned Districts and

also by putting the notice on the Notice Board of the Office of concerned Deputy Superintendent of Education and thereafter, the entire process of counseling be completed within a period of further four weeks subject to fulfilling the eligibility criteria and also if the present petitioners have secured more marks than the last selected candidates.

Let the entire process be completed within a period of four months from the date of receipt/ production of a copy of this order.

19. Let it be made clear that no further counselling shall be held for any reasons whatsoever as the advertisement for appointment of these teachers are of 2015 and the aforesaid directions have been issued in peculiar facts and circumstances of the case, which shall be not taken as precedent."

5. The State of Jharkhand, however, preferred L.P.A No.

203 of 2022 [The State of Jharkhand & Ors. Vs. Paras Nath

Mandal] and other analogous cases challenging the order dated

16.02.2022 passed in W.P.(S) No. 2378 of 2019 and other

analogous cases, which were dismissed by learned Division

Bench vide order dated 15.09.2023 with following direction to

the State of Jharkhand:

"57. This Court, on entirety of facts and circumstances, is of the view that the order passed by learned Single Judge needs no interference by this Court and the direction so passed by learned Single Judge needs no interference by this Court and is required to be complied with at an earliest as the vacancies is of the year 2015 and it must be put to logical end without snatching right of candidates, if they are otherwise eligible. Therefore, the appellants-State are hereby directed to:

I. Initiate the process of counseling forthwith for the present petitioners by way of last opportunity as it is alleged they have obtained more marks than the last selected candidates in the merit list in the respective districts.

II. The petitioners shall approach the Deputy Commissioners of the concerned Districts, as early as possible, preferably, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

III. However, in the meantime, the Deputy Commissioner of the concerned district shall give proper notice to the petitioners by way of Press Communique, advertising the

notice in the local newspaper having the wide circulation in the concerned Districts and also by putting the notice on the Notice Board of the Office of concerned Deputy Superintendent of Education.

IV. This Court hopes and trusts that the entire process of counseling will be completed within a period of further eight weeks subject to fulfilling the eligibility criteria and also if the present petitioners have secured more marks than the last selected candidates.

V. It is made clear that the entire process of selection shall be made strictly in accordance with relevant rules/regulations and judicial pronouncements, as mentioned above, within a period of four months from the date of receipt/production of copy of this order. VI. Let it be made clear that no further counselling shall be held for any reasons whatsoever as the advertisement for appointment of these teachers are of 2015 and the aforesaid directions have been issued in peculiar facts and circumstances of the case, which shall be not taken as precedent."

6. It is also submitted that subsequent to disposal of the

aforesaid L.P.As., a co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order

dated 19.09.2023 has disposed of another writ petition i.e.

W.P.(S) No.3406 of 2021 in following terms:

"5. In view of the fair submissions made by the learned Counsel for the parties, this writ petition is being disposed of in terms of the order dated 16.02.2022, passed by this Court in case of in W.P.(S). No. 2378 of 2019 (Paras Nath Mandal Vs. the State of Jharkhand & Ors.) and other analogous cases as well as LPA No. 203 of 2022 and if the cases of the present petitioners are found to be same and similar to the cases of the petitioners in W.P.(S). No. 2378 of 2019 (Paras Nath Mandal Vs. the State of Jharkhand & Ors.) and other analogous cases, the present petitioner is also entitled for the same benefits.

6. Accordingly, I hereby direct the respondents-authorities to verify the factual aspects/issues involved in the present writ petition vis. a vis. factual aspects/issues involved in W.P.(S). No. 2378 of 2019 (Paras Nath Mandal Vs. the State of Jharkhand & Ors.) and other analogous cases, and if the facts/issues involved in the present writ petition is found to be similar to the aforementioned writ petition, the same benefits may be extended to the present petitioner also in accordance with law, within a period of 8 weeks from the date of receipt/ production of a copy of this order."

7. It is thus submitted by learned counsel for the

petitioners that the present writ petition may also be disposed of

in terms with the order dated 16.02.2022 passed in W.P.(S) No.

2378 of 2019 and other analogous cases as well as the order

dated 15.09.2023 passed by learned Division Bench in the

aforesaid L.P.As. It is further submitted that the process of

counselling in terms with order dated 15.09.2023 passed in

L.P.A No. 203 of 2022 and other analogous cases has not yet

started and as such the respondent authorities may be directed

to also include the petitioners in the said process of counselling

since the candidates who being para teachers had applied under

non-para category and had obtained lesser marks than the

petitioners, were called for counselling held on 03.06.2019.

8. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

respondent-State, while responding to the query of the Court,

submits that as per his instruction, press communique has not

yet been issued by the Deputy Commissioners of the concerned

districts.

9. Under the aforesaid circumstance, the present writ

petition is disposed of in terms with the direction as contained in

order dated 15.09.2023 passed in L.P.A No. 203 of 2022 and

other analogous cases. The respective authorities are

accordingly directed to verify the factual aspect involved in the

present writ petition vis-à-vis the factual aspect/issues involved

in W.P.(S) No. 2378 of 2019 [Paras Nath Mandal Vs. The State of

Jharkhand & Ors.] and other analogous cases as well as L.P.A

No. 203 of 2022 [The State of Jharkhand & Ors. Vs. Paras Nath

Mandal] and other analogous cases. If on verification/scrutiny,

the fact/issue involved in the present writ petition is found to be

similar to the said batch of writ petitions as well as L.P.As., the

same benefit will be extended to the similarly situated

petitioners while following the direction as contained in the

order dated 15.09.2023 passed by learned Division Bench in

L.P.A No. 203 of 2022 and other analogous cases.

(Rajesh Shankar, J.) Ritesh/

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter