Thursday, 14, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Bablu Pandey @ Baba vs The State Of Jharkhand
2021 Latest Caselaw 4773 Jhar

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 4773 Jhar
Judgement Date : 13 December, 2021

Jharkhand High Court
Bablu Pandey @ Baba vs The State Of Jharkhand on 13 December, 2021
            IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
                          Criminal Appeal (DB) No. 807 of 2019
            Bablu Pandey @ Baba                                        ....Appellant
                                             Versus
            The State of Jharkhand                                     ... Respondent
                                       ----
            CORAM:         Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aparesh Kumar Singh
                          Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat Choudhary
                                       ---
            For the Appellant : Mr. Ramawatar Sharma, Advocate
            For the State       : Mrs. Lily Sahay, A.P.P
                                             ---
05/13.12.2021             Heard learned counsel for the appellant, Mr. Ramawatar Sharma

and learned A.P.P, Mrs. Lily Sahay on the prayer for suspension of sentence made by appellant through I.A. No. 4473 of 2021.

Sole appellant along with co-convicts, Shashi Bhushan Singh @ Bhushan Singh and Shashi Ranjan Kumar have been held guilty under Section 394 of I.P.C. However, they have been acquitted of the charges under Section 397, 120(B) & 411 of I.P.C while other accused, Raj Kumar @ Raja Singh, Vicky Singh and Santosh Kumar Singh have been acquitted of the charges under Section 394,397,120(B) of I.P.C by the impugned judgment dated 02.07.2019 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge-II, Koderma in connection with Sessions Trial No. 06 of 2013 and all the three convicts have been sentenced to undergo R.I. for 10 years with a fine of Rs. 10,000/- each and default sentence each under Section 394 of I.P.C.C by the impugned order of sentence dated 09.07.2019.

Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the appellant along with Shashi Ranjan Kumar were allegedly apprehended from a hotel room on the pointing of other accused, Shashi Bhushan Singh @ Bhushan Singh, who was said to have been apprehended while fleeing from the farm house by the police and from these two persons, recovery of cash and a mobile phone etc. was made. It is submitted that prosecution witness nos. 6 and 7 have turned hostile, who were allegedly with the informant P.W.1 in the farm house and P.W. 3 has also not supported the occurrence. Except the informant, other witnesses did not identify the other accused Shashi Bhushan Singh @ Bhushan Singh, who was reportedly arrested from the farm house. It is further submitted that co-convict Shashi Ranjan Kumar has been enlarged on bail by the coordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 23.11.2021 in Cr. Appeal (DB) No. 789 of 2019. The case of the present appellant stands on similar footing to that of appellant Shashi Ranjan Kumar, who was released on bail having remained in custody for about 3 years and 6 months. The present appellant has

been in jail custody for about 3 years and 7 months till date. It is submitted that learned trial court had also recorded that there is no previous conviction of the appellant and I.O had not stated about the criminal antecedent of the convicts. Therefore, the appellant may also be enlarged on bail.

Learned A.P.P has opposed the prayer. It is submitted that the robbery was committed by the accused persons and upon arrest of one of them from the farm house itself and on his pointing, these two convicts were arrested from the hotel and recoveries were also made. Therefore, appellant may not be enlarged on bail.

Upon consideration of the rival submission of the parties and material on record relied upon by them and the period of custody undergone by the appellant and also taking into account the order granting bail to the co- convict, Shashi Ranjan Kumar dated 23.11.2021, we are inclined to grant bail to the appellant by suspending his sentence during pendency of this appeal. Accordingly, appellant above-named shall be released on bail, during the pendency of this appeal, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-II, Koderma in connection with Sessions Trial No. 06 of 2013, subject to the conditions that appellant and his bailors shall not change their address or mobile number without permission of the learned Trial Court. Appellant and their bailors shall also furnish photo copy of their Aadhar Card before the learned Trial Court at the time of his release.

I.A. No. I.A. No. 4473 of 2021 stands allowed.

(Aparesh Kumar Singh, J)

(Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J) Jk/

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter