Wednesday, 20, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

8 vs State Of Jk & Ors
2026 Latest Caselaw 1732 J&K/2

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 1732 J&K/2
Judgement Date : 30 March, 2026

[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Jammu & Kashmir High Court - Srinagar Bench

8 vs State Of Jk & Ors on 30 March, 2026

Author: Rahul Bharti
Bench: Rahul Bharti
                                                                 08
                                                                 Regular
                                                                               2021:JKLHC-SGR:8549



            HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH
                            AT SRINAGAR
                         CM(1412/2026) in SWP 1566/2016
                                CM(1413/2026).

         Manzoor Ahmad Sheikh & Ors.
                                                        ...Applicant(s)/Petitioner(s)
               Through:       Ms. Saima Mehboob, Advocate.

                                           VERSUS

         State Of JK & Ors.
                                                                     ...Respondent(s)
               Through:       Mr. Jahingeer Ahmad Dar, Government Advocate vice
                              Mr. Ilyas Nazir Laway, Government Advocate.


CORAM:
               HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAHUL BHARTI, JUDGE.
                                      ORDER

30.03.2026

01. Writ petition- SWP No. 1566/2016 came to be preferred by eleven

petitioners. Filing of said writ petition had taken place without

availing services of an advocate and that is the reason that the

presentation of the writ petition mentions that it was presented by

the petitioners themselves on 05.10.2016.

02. Later on, Advocate Ms. Saima Mehboob came to file her Power of

Attorney on 08.12.2016 to represent the eleven petitioners.

03. In terms of an order dated 06.10.2016, in response to

Miscellaneous Application- MP 01/2016, this Court had directed

that the present status of the petitioners to remain undisturbed.

04. During course of its pendency, the matter was referred to the

Central Administrative Tribunal, Srinagar wherefrom it came to be

reverted in terms of an order dated 03.08.2022 so as to be taken

again on docket of this Court by its original number- SWP No.

1566/2016.

05. In said writ petition, response from the respondents' end2021:JKLHC-SGR:8549 was

awaited. Reply on behalf of the respondent No. 4 came to be filed as

is reflected in the order dated 18.11.2023 whereas response from

the end of the respondents No. 1 to 3 was awaited with a caveat that

default in filing the reply by the next date was to result in closure of

the right to file the reply.

06. In terms of an order dated 24.05.2024, the right to file reply on

behalf of the respondents No. 1 to 3 came to be closed.

07. In terms of an order dated 12.11.2024, this Court had called upon

Mr. Syed Musaib, learned Deputy Advocate General to confirm the

fact as to whether the petitioners were still in state of service with

Municipal Committee, Sumbal or not and also whether the

petitioners had been employed in any other Municipal Committee

and for that purpose Director, Urbal Local Bodies Kashmir was

directed to submit an affidavit to said extent.

08. It appears that said direction of this Court had gone begging

compliance from the end of the Director, Urban Local Bodies

Kashmir.

09. Amidst said state of proceedings, the case came to suffer dismissal

for non-prosecution in terms of an order dated 01.12.2025 for

seeking restoration of which eleven petitioners have come forward

again through Advocate Ms Saima Mehboob who has cited her

personal medical condition as a reason for non-appearance.

10. Restoration application- CM No. 1413/2026 is accompanied with a

condonation of delay application- CM No. 1412/2026.

11. For the reasons set out in both the applications relatable to the

medical condition of the counsel for the petitioners, this Court

allows both the applications and restores the writ petition back to its original number but without reviving the interim direction as 2021:JKLHC-SGR:8549

obtaining in order dated 06.10.2016

12. It appears that the scanning of order dated 12.11.2024 suffered

omission and that is the reason that the digital file does not bear

stamp order dated 12.11.2024, whereas the scanning section

"Scanned Digitization Section" is said to have done the needful

on 13.11.2024.

13. Surely, there is a serious lapse on the part of the Registry in

carrying out due diligence in the matter for which the Registrar

Judicial, Srinagar is directed to get the matter looked into and fix

the responsibility.

14. This Court directs the Registrar Judicial, Srinagar to ensure that

the order dated 12.11.2024 is duly scanned to become part of the

digital file as well.

15. On the next date of hearing, Director, Urban Local Bodies, Kashmir

is directed to remain present in person in case requisite affidavit is

not filed from his end.

16. List on 15th April, 2025.

17. A copy of this order be provided by the Registrar Judicial, Srinagar

to Mr. Ilyas Nazir Laway, learned Government Advocate for the sake

of notice and compliance at the end of the Director, Urban Local

Bodies Kashmir.

(RAHUL BHARTI) JUDGE SRINAGAR 30.03.2026 Bisma Jan.

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter