Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 24 J&K
Judgement Date : 20 January, 2026
2026:JKLHC-JMU:38
Serial No. 10
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH
AT JAMMU
WP(C) No. 68/2026
Date of pronouncement: 20.01.2026
Date of uploading: 20.01.2026
Tarlok Singh, Aged 63 years
S/o Isher Singh .....Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)
R/o Nanad Nagar, Jammu, UT of J&K
Through: Mr. Anirudh Sharma, Advocate
vs
1. Jammu Development Authority through ..... Respondent(s)
Vice Chairman, JDA, Jammu.
2. Secretary, Jammu Development Authority,
Jammu.
3. Director Land Management, Jammu
Development Authority, Jammu
Through: Mr. Atul Verma, Advocate vice
Mr. Adarsh Sharma, Advocate
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SEKHRI, JUDGE
ORDER
20.01.2026
1. The petitioner claims to be in continuous possession of plot No. 204,
measuring 18 Marlas, 171 Sq. ft., situate at Sector No. 13, Nanak
Nagar, Jammu, after residential house came to be constructed by his
predecessor-in-interest. Petitioner seeks regularisation/ownership
rights in the light of Government orders issued from time to time
including Government Order No. 208-UD of 1989 dated 16.08.1989.
Petitioner is also stated to have made several representations before
the respondents for regularisation of the subject land, which, according
to the petitioner, have not evoked any response till date.
2. Mr. Anirudh Sharma, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has
relied upon a judgment dated 14.05.2025 passed by a Co-ordinate
2026:JKLHC-JMU:38
Bench of this Court in WP(C) No. 1186/2020 titled "Gurmeet Kour
Vs. Union Territory of J&K & Ors. to claim parity and submits that he
will be satisfied, in case the respondents are directed to consider the
claim of the petitioner on the same lines and in particular in view of
the aforesaid Government Order No. 208-UD of 1989, to which
learned counsel opposite has no objection.
3. Having regard to the limited nature of the controversy and innocuous
prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the present writ
petition is admitted to hearing at its threshold and disposed of with a
direction to the respondents to consider the claim of the petitioner
within a period of six weeks from the date a copy of this order along
with copy of writ petition and annexures are made available.
4. Disposed of along with connected application(s).
(Rajesh Sekhri) Judge
Jammu 20.01.2026 Vishal Sharma
Whether the order is reportable? Yes/No
Whether the order is speaking? Yes/No
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!