Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 160 J&K
Judgement Date : 16 May, 2025
Sr. No. 66
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH
AT JAMMU
Case No:- CPSW No 10/2018
Raj Kumar .....Petitioner(s)
Through: Ms. ManpreetKour, Advocate
Vs
Sanjeev Verma, Secy. G. A D and Anr. ..... Respondent(s)
Through: Ms. Priyanka Bhat, Advocate vice
Mrs. Monika Kohli, Sr. AAG
Coram: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAVED IQBAL WANI, JUDGE
ORDER
16.05.2025
1. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that
respondents/contemnors have in furtherance of the judgment and order passed
by this Court, where under the instant contempt petition has arisen, passed a
HIGH consideration order, rejecting the claim of the petitioner which, as such,required OF JAMMU & COURT to be called -in - question by the petitioner.
KASHMIR AND
2. Having regard to the submission of the learned counsel for the LADAKH petitioner, the notice issued in the contempt petition is recalled and proceedings
are closed with liberty to the petitioner to work out remedy against the
consideration order, if so, advised.
(Javed Iqbal Wani) Judge Jammu 16.05.2025 Javid Iqbal
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!