Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 868 J&K
Judgement Date : 5 February, 2025
Serial No. 15
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH
AT JAMMU
CCP(S) No. 373/2023 in
SWP No. 1603/2006
c/w
CCP(S) No. 8/2024
Mohd. Ahsan Zargar .....Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through: Mr. S. Rupinder Singh, Advocate.
vs
Prashant Goyal Principal Secretary ..... Respondent(s)
Housing and Urban Dev. Dept. and another
Through: Ms. Monika Thakur, Advocate vice
Mr. S. S. Nanda, Sr. AAG.
Coram: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNESH OSWAL, JUDGE
ORDER
05.02.2025
CCP(S) No. 373/2023
1. The respondents have filed the compliance report, thereby placing on
record order dated 11.01.2025 whereby sanction has been accorded for
promotion/confirmation of Mr. Mohd. Ahsan Zargar as Assistant
Sanitation Officer notionally with effect from 18.12.2008.
2. Mr. Rupinder Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner contends that
the petitioner was entitled to promotion with effect from the year 2006
and he was also required to be considered for further promotions,
which has not been done by the respondents. He has further drawn
attention of this Court towards the para 7 of the statement of facts,
wherein it has been mentioned that the case of the petitioner for
conferring benefit at the level of Executive Officer and above on the
basis of the re-fixation of his seniority and promotion/confirmation is
c/w
required to be considered by the Government, which is the competent
authority.
3. In view of this, let fresh compliance report be filed by the respondent,
strictly in terms of the judgment, by or before the next date of hearing.
4. The respondents have filed the compliance report, thereby placing on
record order dated 04.12.2024 whereby sanction has been accorded for
promotion/confirmation of Sh. Vinod Kumar as Assistant Sanitation
Officer notionally with effect from 18.12.2008.
5. Mr. Rupinder Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner contends that
the petitioner was entitled to promotion with effect from the year 2006
and he was also required to be considered for further promotions,
which has not been done by the respondents. He has further drawn
attention of this Court towards the para 7 of the statement of facts,
wherein it has been mentioned that the case of the petitioner for
conferring benefit at the level of Executive Officer and above on the
basis of the re-fixation of his seniority and promotion/confirmation is
required to be considered by the Government, which is the competent
authority.
6. In view of this, let fresh compliance report be filed by the respondent,
strictly in terms of the judgment, by or before the next date of hearing.
7. List on 21.02.2025.
(RAJNESH OSWAL) JUDGE
Jammu 05.02.2025 Sahil Padha
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!