Wednesday, 20, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Raj Kumar Dabgotra vs Arun Kumar Mehta
2025 Latest Caselaw 2977 J&K

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 2977 J&K
Judgement Date : 12 December, 2025

[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Jammu & Kashmir High Court

Raj Kumar Dabgotra vs Arun Kumar Mehta on 12 December, 2025

                                                                        Sr.No. 13
                                                                                2025:JKLHC-JMU:4111
       HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH
                             AT JAMMU
CJ Court
                   Case No. : CPSW No. 15/2014 in
                              [SWP No. 2495/2013]
                              IA No. 69/2014
Raj Kumar Dabgotra                           ..... Appellant/Petitioner(s)

                        Through: None.
                   Vs

Arun Kumar Mehta                                                   ..... Respondent(s)

                        Through: Ms. Saliqa Sheikh, Assisting Counsel to
                                 Mr. Raman Sharma, AAG
Coram:     HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
                                      ORDER

12.12.2025

1. The petitioner seeks initiation of contempt proceedings against the respondent for willful/deliberate violation of the order passed by this Court in SWP No. 2495 of 2013 (Raj Kumar Dabgotra Vs State of J&K and Anr.) decided on November 21, 2013:

"This petition, at request, is disposed of with a direction to respondents to accord consideration to the representation claimed to have been made by the petitioner, of course, in accordance with the rules occupying the field and take decision thereon within a period of six weeks from the date copy of the order is served upon them.

Petitioner may on his part, handover copy of petition and copies of its annexures to respondents so as to facilitate early decision in the matter.

Disposed of along with connected CMA(s)."

2. Learned counsel for the respondent, at the outset, has drawn the attention of the Court to Paragraph 2 of the statement of facts, per which in compliance to the order dated November 21, 2013, the competent Authority had considered the claim of the petitioner and it was found that he (R.K. Dabgotra) was next eligible incumbent for placement as I/C Executive Engineer, under Social Caste Category and would be considered in the relevant category as per roster on the basis of his merit in seniority under OBC Category:

"That in compliance to the judgment of the Hon'ble High Court dated 21.11.2013 in SWP No. 2495/2013. The case of the petitioner was examined and considered and it is found that Shri R.K. Dabgotra is next eligible incumbent for placement as I/C Executive Engineer, under Social Caste Category and he will be considered in the relevant

2025:JKLHC-JMU:4111

category as per the roster on the basis of his merit in seniority under social caste category"

3. In the wake of the above, nothing substantive survives in the petition and the same is disposed of as having been rendered infructuous.

                        (                                  (ARUN PALLI)
                                                          CHIEF JUSTICE
Jammu
12.12.2025
Pawan Angotra





 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter