Wednesday, 20, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Bhola Ram Sharma vs Sourab Bhagat & Anr
2023 Latest Caselaw 537 j&K

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 537 j&K
Judgement Date : 18 March, 2023

Jammu & Kashmir High Court
Bhola Ram Sharma vs Sourab Bhagat & Anr on 18 March, 2023
                                            Sr. No. 26
       HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH
                       AT JAMMU
                                                       CPSW No. 270/2017


Bhola Ram Sharma                                  .... Petitioner/Appellant(s)

                          Through:-   Mr. Nitin Bhasin, Advocate

                 V/s

Sourab Bhagat & anr.                                       .....Respondent(s)

                          Through:-   Mr. Ranjit Singh Jamwal, AAG

CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, JUDGE
                                      ORDER

01. Petitioner has initiated the contempt proceedings against the

respondents for non-compliance of the judgment dated 29.03.2016 passed by

this Court in SWP No. 434/2011, by virtue of which, the writ petition was

allowed. Operative part of the judgment reads as under:-

"The petitioner is held entitled to regularization as electrician in

the pay scale of Rs.900-1830 against one of the posts created in

the year 1989 and shall be given effect of the same w.e.f., the

date when he was originally regularized as Helper in the pay

scale of Rs.630-940. He shall also be entitled to arrears from the

said date."

02. This Court vide order dated 16.09.2021, held that the judgment dated

29.03.2016 stands partially complied with and so far as payment of arrears are

concerned, that part of the judgment still has not been complied with by the

respondents and further eight weeks' time was granted to the respondents for

complying the above mentioned judgment.

03. This Court vide order dated 30.09.2022 again directed the respondents

to pass a fresh detailed consideration order strictly inconformity with the

direction passed by this Court vide order dated 29.03.2016 in SWP No.

434/2011, specifically dealing with the issue of admissible arrears, being paid

to the petitioner.

04. In terms of the order dated 30.09.2022, fresh compliance report has

been filed by the respondents wherein it has been stated that they have passed

the detailed consideration Order No. 105-E of 2022-23 dated 14.02.2023 in

compliance to the order dated 30.09.2022. Relevant extract of the said

consideration order is reproduced as under:

"Whereas the Government Order No. 1108-PW (I&PHE) of 1989

dated 18.12.1989 provided the pay scale of Mechanic as 1150-2050 and pay

scale of Electrician as 900-1830. It is pertinent mention here that the pay

scale of Mechanic was revised from 1150-2050 to 1400-2600 and the pay

scale of Electrician' was also revised from 900-1830 to 1200-2040.

Accordingly, the same was mentioned in Govt. order No. 74 of 1995-96

dated 21.09.1995 passed by the Chief Engineer, I&FC Department, Jammu

for the implementation of SRO-149 of 1973 as per Hon'ble High Court

Order dated23.03.1993 and 11.03.1993 and the respective benefits were

granted in favour of Sh. Ghulam Qadir Sofi Dr. and the petitioner keeping in

view the relevant Government Orders and pay-revisions at that time.

Whereas the petitioner was already been granted higher pay scale of

900-1830 (pre-revised) / 1200-2040 (revised) w.e.f. 24.11.1990 as per Govt.

Order No. 74 of 1995-96 dated 21.09.1995 and vide Govt. Order No. 36-PW

(Hyd) of 2020 dated 28.01.2020, the petitioner was regularized as Electrician

in the pay scale of 900-1830 (pre revised) / 1200-2040 (revised) w.e.f.

24.11.1990 without any arrears as nothing stands due in the favour of the

petitioner."

05. In view of the aforesaid, the judgment of this court dated 29.03.2016

passed by this Court in SWP No. 434/2011 has been complied with, therefore,

nothing survives for further consideration in the present petition.

06. Accordingly, proceedings in the present petition are closed and rule

framed, if any, stands discharged.

07. However, petitioner is at liberty to challenge the aforesaid

consideration Order No. 105-E of 2022-23 dated 14.02.2023, if he so advised.

08. Disposed of as indicated above.

(Wasim Sadiq Nargal) Judge JAMMU 18.03.2023 RAM MURTI

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter