Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 992 j&K/2
Judgement Date : 21 August, 2023
S. No.10
,
Regular List
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH
AT SRINAGAR
CCP(S) No.502/2019
In OWP No.1430/2017
,,,
RAJ MOHAMMAD KHAN AND ANOTHER
... Petitioner(s)
Through:- None
Vs.
KHALID JAHANGIR AND ANOTHER
...Respondent(s)
Through:- Mr.Fahim Nisar Shah, Dy.AG
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY DHAR, JUDGE
ORDER
21.08.2023
1. Through the medium of instant petition the petitioner has
raised a grievance that order dated 15.11.2018 passed by the Writ
Court in OWP No.1430/2017 has not been implemented by the
respondents. Vide the aforesaid order, Collector Land Acquisition
Anantnag was directed to proceed with the land acquisition
proceedings initiated by him on 11.11.2013 pursuant to issuance of
notification under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act. It was
further directed that the Collector shall take the land acquisition
proceedings to logical end by pronouncing the award.
2. Statement of facts/compliance report has been filed by the
respondents. In the said report it has been submitted by the
respondents that a private negotiation committee meeting between
CCP(S) No.502/2019 in OWP No.1430/2017 page 1 of 2 the parties under the chairmanship of Dy.Commissioner Anantnag
was held on 15.07.2019 and after negotiation, rate of Rs.30 lacs per
kanal was accepted by the petitioner and approved by the said
Committee. An amount of Rs. 6 lacs was released in favour of the
petitioner on 15.07.2019. Further amount of Rs.3 lacs also stands
disbursed to the petitioner on 10.12.2022. It has been further
submitted that an amount of Rs.1.50 lacs also stands disbursed in
favour of the petitioner on 14.03.2023 and finally the balance
amount of 1.50 lacs stands disbursed in favour of petitioner in terms
of voucher dated 17.07.2023.
3. Nobody has appeared on behalf of the petitioner to dispute the
aforesaid facts.
4. In view of the fact that in terms of judgment of the writ Court
compensation stands assessed and disbursed to the petitioner, no
case for proceeding against the respondents is made out.
5. Accordingly, the contempt proceedings are closed and the
petition stands disposed of.
(SANJAY DHAR) JUDGE SRINAGAR 21.08.2023 Sarveeda Nissar
Whether the order is speaking: Yes/No Whether the order is reportable: Yes/No
CCP(S) No.502/2019 in OWP No.1430/2017 page 2 of 2
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!