Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 1516 j&K
Judgement Date : 28 October, 2022
Sr.No.02
tHIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH
AT JAMMU
RP No. 31/2019
Anil Kumar ..... Petitioner(s)
Through: Mr. Ravinder Parihar, Advocate.
Vs
State of J and K and others ..... Respondents(s)
Through: None.
Coram: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD CHATTERJI KOUL, JUDGE
ORDER
28.10.2022
After arguing for a while, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that
he be permitted to withdraw this petition with liberty to the petitioner to seek
recourse to the remedy available to him under law as the grievance of the
petitioner is that the judgment whereby the direction was given to consider him
for appointment has not been implemented.
In view of the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner,
this petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to take
recourse to the remedy available under law in case, he has any grievance with
regard to the non-implementation of the judgment.
(Vinod Chatterji Koul) Judge Jammu 28.10.2022 Renu
RENU BALA 2022.10.29 13:53 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!