Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 1167 j&K
Judgement Date : 22 September, 2021
Sr. No. 93
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH
AT JAMMU
(Through virtual mode)
WP(C) No. 1998/2021
CM No. 7424/2021
Dali Devi & anr. .... Petitioner/Appellant(s)
Through:- Mr. Suhail Shahbaz, Advocate
V/s
UT of J&K & ors. .....Respondent(s)
Through:-
CORAM : HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SINDHU SHARMA, JUDGE
ORDER
1. Petitioners seek a direction to respondent Nos. 2 to 6 to protect their
life and liberty as they have married against the wishes of private
respondent Nos. 7 to 10, who are threatening them. It is submitted that
the petitioners are major and have married out of their own free will. The
proof of petitioners' date of birth has been placed on record. Petitioners
submit that since they have solemnized the marriage against the wishes of
respondent Nos. 7 to 10, as such, they are facing harassment at their
hands. Both the petitioners are present, through virtual mode, and are
identified by their counsel.
2. Issue notice to the respondents, returnable within four weeks.
Requisites for the same within one week.
3. List on 27.10.2021.
4. Meanwhile, subject to objections and till next date before the
Bench, respondent Nos. 2 to 6 shall not act in violation of the directions
contained in the judgment rendered in case titled Lata Singh v. State of
U.P. and anr.; 2006 (5) SCC 475, and shall ensure that nobody interferes
in their married life and adequate security be provided to them, if the
petitioners approach them.
(Sindhu Sharma) Judge JAMMU 22.09.2021 RAM MURTI
RAM MURTI 2021.09.23 14:39 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!