Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 1382 j&K
Judgement Date : 1 November, 2021
Sr. No. 14
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH
AT JAMMU
CEA No. 82/2018
Commissioner of Central CST and .....Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Central Excise Jammu
Through: Mr. Jagpaul Singh, Advocate.
Vs
M/s JMW India Pvt. Ltd. ..... Respondent(s)
Through: Mr. Amar Pratap Singh, Advocate.
Coram: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR, JUDGE
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PUNEET GUPTA, JUDGE
ORDER
01.11.2021
We have heard learned counsel for the parties. Upon hearing learned
counsels, the following substantial questions of law are framed for consideration: -
a. Whether the findings recorded by the Tribunal in favour of the respondents
are perverse and contrary to the evidence on record;
b. Whether the Tribunal was justified in placing reliance upon the retracted
statement during cross-examination, belatedly recorded after a period of
more than one year and is contrary to the judgment of the Apex Court
reported in (2007) 4 SC 118.
c. Whether the Tribunal was right in holding that the refunds once sanctioned
could not be recovered back by the Revenue Department by initiating
proceedings under Section 11-A of the Central Excise Act without
challenging the same.
List for consideration on 28.12.2021.
(Puneet Gupta) (Dhiraj Singh Thakur)
Judge Judge
Jammu
01.11.2021
Naresh
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!