Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 958 j&K
Judgement Date : 24 August, 2021
Sr. No. 55
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR
AT JAMMU
MA 328/2017
CM(2014/2020)
Union of India Th. Ministry of Surface and others
.... Appellant(s)
Through:- Mr. Suneel Malhotra, Advocate
v/s
Urmila Kumari and another
..... Respondent(s)
Through:- Mr. Jatinder Singh, CGSC
Coram: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAVED IQBAL WANI, JUDGE
ORDER
1. The present appeal has been filed by the appellants under
Section 173 of Motor Vehicle Act, against the judgment/award dated
07.07.2017, ( for brevity 'impugned award') passed by Learned Presiding
Officer, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Jammu, ( for brevity 'Tribunal'),
whereby compensation of Rs. 12,23.500/- along interest @ 7.5% per annum
from the date of institution of the petition till its realization has been
awarded in favour of the claimants/respondents herein.
2. According to learned counsel for the appellants the issue
involved in the instant appeal is squarely covered by the Apex Court
judgment reported in 2017 ACJ 2700 titled National Insurance Co. Ltd. vs.
Pranay Sethi and others.
3. The short point raised in the instant appeal is that the Tribunal
while passing impugned award held the claimants entitled to compensation
on the following counts, which is on the higher side:-
1. Loss of Dependence = Rs. 10,93,500/-
2. Funeral, Expenses = Rs. 25,000/-
3. Loss of love and affection = Rs. l ,00,000/-
4. Loss of Estate = Rs. 5,000/-
Total = Rs.12,23,500/-
4. According to learned counsel for the appellants, the 50%
enhancement in future income awarded by the Tribunal while passing the
award in question runs in conflict with the amount of enhancement
provided by the Pranay Sethi's case (supra) as the deceased was self
employed. Further, it is being contended that Rs. 25,000/- awarded by the
Tribunal towards funeral expenses also is in conflict with the Pranav Sethi's
case (supra), which is Rs. 15,000/-.
5. Further, learned counsel for the appellants contends that
amount of Rs. 1,00,000/- awarded by the Tribunal towards loss of love and
affection is also on the higher side and also in conflict with the quantum
provided by the Apex Court in the judgment (supra), which is Rs. 40,000/-.
6. Learned counsel for the claimants/respondents herein fairly
concedes to the legal position projected by the learned counsel for the
appellants and prays for settlement of the appeal in the light of the
points/grounds urged by the appellants in the instant appeal. However, it is
contended that instead of Rs. 5000/- awarded for loss of estate, Rs. 15,000/-
has to be awarded in view of the judgment (supra), which position is not
being disputed by learned counsel for the appellants.
7. Having regard to the nature of controversy raised by the
learned counsel for the appellants and consent extended by the learned
counsel for the claimants/respondents herein, the compensation amount
granted by the learned Tribunal under the head of 'loss of dependence' is
reduced from Rs. 10,93,500/-to Rs,10,20,600/-. Compensation granted
under the head of 'funeral expenses' is reduced from 25,000/- to Rs.
15,000/- and under the head of 'loss of loss and affection' from Rs.
1,00,000/- to Rs. 40,000/-. However, in view of the Pranav Sethi's case
(supra) compensation awarded towards 'loss of estate' is enhanced from Rs.
5000/- to Rs.15,000/-. Consequently, compensation amount payable to the
claimants-respondents herein is reduced from Rs.12,23,500/- to Rs.
10,90,600/-.
8. The break-up of modified compensation awarded is provided
as under:-
1. Loss of Dependence = Rs. 10,20,600/-
2. Funeral, Expenses = Rs. 15,000/-
3. Loss of love and affection = Rs. 40,000/-
4. Loss of Estate = Rs. 15,000/-
Total = Rs. 10,90,600/-
9. Registry is directed to release the modified compensation (supra)
along with the interest as allowed by the Tribunal in favour of the
claimants, subject to their verification and identification by their appearing
counsel. The rest of the remaining amount shall be paid back to the
appellants along with interest that may have accrued thereon.
10. Thus, with the aforesaid modification, the instant appeal is
disposed of.
(JAVED IQBAL WANI) JUDGE
Jammu 24.08.2021 Bir
Whether the order is speaking: Yes/No Whether the order is reportable: Yes/No
BIR BAHADUR SINGH 2021.08.27 11:02 I am the author of this document
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!