Wednesday, 20, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

_____________________________________________________________________ vs State Of Himachal Pradesh & Anr
2025 Latest Caselaw 6189 HP

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 6189 HP
Judgement Date : 29 May, 2025

Himachal Pradesh High Court

_____________________________________________________________________ vs State Of Himachal Pradesh & Anr on 29 May, 2025

Author: Sandeep Sharma
Bench: Sandeep Sharma
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
                                               CWP No.8937 of 2025
                                       Date of Decision: 29.05.2025
_____________________________________________________________________
Suraj Singh & Ors.                                        .........Petitioners
                                         Versus
State of Himachal Pradesh & Anr.                         .......Respondents

Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?
For the Petitioners:      Mr. Vinod Chauhan, Advocate.

For the respondent:       Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General, Mr. Rajan
                          Kahol, Mr. Vishal Panwar & Mr. B.C. Verma,
                          Additional Advocate Generals with Mr. Ravi
                          Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General, for
                          respondents-State.
___________________________________________________________________________
Sandeep Sharma, J. (Oral)

By way of instant petition, petitioners have prayed for the

following main reliefs:

"(i) That respondent May Kindly be Directed to grant the similar benefit of higher stage of Pay as granted by the department in terms of the Judgment passed in CWP 1638 of 2024 titled as Mohit Sharma Vs State of HP.

(ii) That this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to issue the Writ in the nature of mandamus, order or directions directing the Respondents to regularize the services of the Petitioner w.e.f. the date when the Petitioner have completed their two years' service on contract basis i.e. from the date the Regularization Policy was liberalized, along with all consequential benefits, including the benefit of Himachal Pradesh Civil Services (Revised pay) Rules, 2022 and the petitioner be accorded the benefit of Himachal Pradesh Civil Services (Revised pay) Rules, 2022 after taking

into account the services rendered by them on contract basis as having been appointed prior to 03.01.2022, as has been approved by the Cabinet on 14.10.2022.

(iii) That this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to issue the Writ in the nature of mandamus directing the Respondents to extend the benefits of the Notifications dated 03.01.2022 & 06.09.2022 and Grant Higher Stage of Pay in the Concerned Level of Pay Matrix i.e. Rs. 30500/- as per Notification dated 06.09.2022 and fix higher pay from due date i.e. after completion two years of contractual service with all consequential benefits including the arrears along with interest @ 9%."

2. Before reply, if any, from the respondents could be

received, learned counsel representing the petitioners, while inviting

attention of this Court to judgment passed by Coordinate Bench this

Court in CWP No. 1638 of 2024 titled Mohit Sharma & Anr. Vs.

State of Himachal Pradesh & Ors., states that issue raised in the

instant proceedings already stands adjudicated by Coordinate Bench

this Court in Mohit Sharma (supra) and as such, petitioners would be

content and satisfied in case directions are issued to the respondents

to consider the representations of the petitioners in light of aforesaid

judgment in a time bound manner.

3. While putting in appearance on behalf of respondents, Mr.

Ravi Chauhan, learned Deputy Advocate General, states that he is not

averse to aforesaid innocuous prayer made on behalf of the petitioners

and representations, if any, filed by the petitioners shall be considered

and decided expeditiously.

3. Consequently, in view of the above, this Court, without

going into the merits of the case, deems it fit to dispose of the present

petition with a direction to the respondents to consider and decide the

representations of the petitioners (Annexure P-3) in light of Mohit

Sharma (supra), expeditiously, preferably within a period of four

weeks from today. Ordered accordingly. Needless to say, authority

concerned, while doing the needful in terms of instant order, shall

afford an opportunity of being heard to the petitioner and pass

speaking order thereafter. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed

of.

May 29, 2025                                   (Sandeep Sharma),
      (sunil)                                       Judge
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter