Thursday, 21, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Rajinder Kumar vs State Of H.P. & Ors
2025 Latest Caselaw 5858 HP

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 5858 HP
Judgement Date : 21 May, 2025

Himachal Pradesh High Court

Rajinder Kumar vs State Of H.P. & Ors on 21 May, 2025

Author: Jyotsna Rewal Dua
Bench: Jyotsna Rewal Dua

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.8384 of 2025 Date of decision: 21.05.2025 Rajinder Kumar. ...Petitioner.

                               Versus
State of H.P. & Ors.                                            ...Respondents.

Coram:
Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?

For the petitioner              :      Mr. Suneel Awasthi, Advocate.
For the respondents             :      Mr. Rajat Chaudhary, Assistant
                                       Advocate      General,       for
                                       respondents No.1 to 3-State.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge

Notice confined to respondents No.1 to 3, which

is waived by Mr. Rajat Chaudhary, Assistant Advocate

General.

2. Petitioner's grievance is to the office order dated

26.04.2025, whereunder he serving as Lecturer School New

(History) stands transferred from GSSS Kangoo, District

Hamirpur to GSSS Sheran, District Solan. The transfer was

ordered vice respondent No.4, who was brought in the place

of the petitioner from GSSS Sheran. Learned counsel for the

petitioner contended that the aforesaid transfer has been

effected on the basis of DO Note in order to accommodate

1Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes

respondent No.4. It was also submitted that the petitioner is

suffering from 50% locomotive disability and therefore, in

accordance with applicable transfer policy, he is required to

be considered for posting at a station keeping in view his

comfort. It was also pointed that petitioner has preferred a

representation to the respondents on 03.05.2025, which has

not been decided by the respondents till date.

Though the petitioner has assailed his transfer

order on the ground of it having been issued on the basis of

DO Note, however during the course of hearing learned

counsel for the petitioner admitted that petitioner has

completed more than normal tenure at his present place of

posting and is thus liable to be transferred out from his

present place.

3. Learned Assistant Advocate General was also

directed to have instructions from the respondents in the

matter. The instructions have been placed on record. As per

the instructions, pursuant to the impugned transfer order,

the petitioner has joined at GSSS Sheran, District Solan, on

03.05.2025; The petitioner is 50% handicapped and Clause

5.3 of Comprehensive Guiding Principles-2013 provides for

adjusting the employees suffering from 60% and above

physical disability to a station of their choice subject to

availability of vacancy and in case the aforesaid adjustment

is not possible, they should at least be given posting on road

heads or convenient station where bus service is available.

The Clause reads as under:-

"5.3 Concessions to handicapped employees: As far as possible, Officers/Officials with 60% and above physical disability should be given stations of their choice. In the circumstances where it is absolutely not possible, subject to vacancy, they should at least be given postings on road heads or convenient stations where bus service is available."

The instructions are also to the effect that the

aforesaid provision was kept in view while transferring the

petitioner to GSSS Sheran, District Solan, as the institution

where the petitioner has been transferred is on road head

side, where he has already joined.

4. Nonetheless, the fact remains that even though

the petitioner has completed normal tenure at the present

place of posting, yet it has not been refuted by the

respondents that the petitioner's impugned transfer to a

specific place had been ordered on the basis of DO Note.

Keeping that in view and without interfering with the transfer

of respondent No.4 under the impugned order, this writ

petition is disposed of with direction to the respondents to

consider case of the petitioner for his transfer afresh and

also to decide his representation dated 03.05.2025

(Annexure P-3) in accordance with law and as per applicable

policy within a period of two weeks from today. Ordered

accordingly. The order so passed be also communicated to

the petitioner.

The writ petition stands disposed of in the above

terms, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if

any.


                                          Jyotsna Rewal Dua
21st May, 2025                                 Judge
  (Pardeep)
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter