Wednesday, 20, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Param Bir Singh Chauhan vs . Income Tax Officer & Others
2025 Latest Caselaw 488 HP

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 488 HP
Judgement Date : 6 May, 2025

Himachal Pradesh High Court

Param Bir Singh Chauhan vs . Income Tax Officer & Others on 6 May, 2025

Bench: Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Sushil Kukreja

Param Bir Singh Chauhan Vs. Income Tax Officer & others CWP No.7386 of 2025

06.05.2025 Present: Mr. Praveen Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. Neeraj Sharma and Mr. Ishaan Kashyap, Advocates, for the respondents.

CWP No.7386 of 2025 & CMP No.9577 of 2025

The issue raised in the instant writ petition also arises in

CWP No. 5202 of 2024, titled Vinod Kumar vs. Income Tax

Officer & others, and in CWP No. 10541 of 2024, titled MK Steel

Traders vs. DCIT & others.

2. In MK Steel Traders' case (supra), a coordinate bench

has passed an interim order, whereby stay of all further proceedings

has been granted pursuant to issuance of notice under Section 148

of the Income-tax Act, 1961 [in short "Act"].

3. The principal submission advanced by learned counsel

for the petitioner is that the impugned notice (Annexure P-2) under

Section 148 of the Act, concerning the assessment year 2020-21,

has been issued by the Jurisdictional Assessing Officer (JAO),

whereas it should have been dealt with as per the provisions of

Section 144B of the Act.

4 Mr. Neeraj Sharma, Advocate, in support of his plea,

relies upon the 'e-Assessment of Income Escaping Assessment

Scheme, 2022' (Annexure P-4), appended to the petition.

5. In the interim order dated 20.09.2024, passed by a

coordinate bench in MK Steel Traders, there is a reference to the

decision of other courts including the decision rendered by the

Bombay High Court in Hexaware Technologies Ltd. vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, [2024] 162 taxmann.com 225

(Bombay).

6. We are also informed that a Special Leave Petition

[SLP] has been preferred against the judgment of the Bombay High

Court in Hexaware Technologies Ltd.

7. Learned counsel for the respondents/revenue informs us

that notice has been issued in the SLP filed against the judgment in

Hexaware Technologies Ltd. A copy of the order has been placed

before us.

8. A perusal of the order dated 03.09.2024 passed in SLP

(Civil) Diary No. 37843 of 2024, titled Principal Commissioner of

Income Tax & Ors. vs. Hexaware Technologies Ltd., discloses

that notice has been issued in the appeal. A direction has also been

issued to tag the matter with SLP (C) 27736/2023.

9. Given the aforesaid position, we are inclined to issue

notice in the above-captioned writ petition as well.

10. Notice. Mr. Neeraj Sharma, Advocate, appears and

waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents.

11. Given the fact that a coordinate bench has passed a

detailed interim order on 20.09.2024 pursuant to which further

proceedings have been stayed, and that the Hon'ble Supreme Court

has not stayed the operation of the judgment in Hexaware

Technologies Ltd., in the instant case as well, proceedings shall

remain stayed till further orders of the Court.

12. Needless to add, if the Hon'ble Supreme Court passes

an order to the contrary, the respondents/revenue will be at liberty to

approach the Court for appropriate directions, including vacation of

the interim order.

13. List on 19.05.2025, along-with connected matters.

( Tarlok Singh Chauhan ) Judge

( Sushil Kukreja ) Judge May 06, 2025 (VH)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter