Thursday, 21, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Decided On : 02.06.2025 vs Padam Sain & Another
2025 Latest Caselaw 999 HP

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 999 HP
Judgement Date : 2 June, 2025

Himachal Pradesh High Court

Decided On : 02.06.2025 vs Padam Sain & Another on 2 June, 2025

Author: Virender Singh
Bench: Virender Singh
                                                                     2025:HHC:17174

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA

                                              Cr. Revision No.652 of 2024
                                              Decided on    : 02.06.2025

Amar Nath                                                                ...Petitioner

                                          Versus

Padam Sain & Another                                                   ...Respondents

Coram
The Hon'ble Mr. Justice Virender Singh, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?1

For the petitioner                   :       Petitioner in person with Mr.
                                             Amit Kumar Dhumal & Ms.
                                             Parul Negi, Advocates.
For the respondent                   :       Mr. Gurudev Negi, Advocate,
                                             for respondent No.1.

                                             Mr. Rohit Sharma, Deputy
                                             Advocate    General, for
                                             respondent No.2.

Virender Singh, Judge (oral)

Petitioner­Amar Nath has filed the present

revision petition against the judgment dated 20.07.2024,

passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Kinnaur at Rampur

Bushahr (Camp at Reckong Peo), H.P. (hereinafter referred

to as the 'Appellate Court'), in Criminal Appeal No.9 of

2024, titled as Amar Nath versus Padam Singh.

Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes.

2 2025:HHC:17174

2. By way of judgment dated 20.07.2024, the

learned Appellate Court has dismissed the appeal filed by

the petitioner against the judgment of conviction, dated

22.08.2023 and order of sentence dated 29.12.2023,

passed by the Court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate,

Kinnaur at Reckong Peo, H.P., (hereinafter referred to as

the 'trial Court'), in Comp. U/s 138 NIA No.111/2016,

titled as Padam Sain versus Amar Nath.

3. Vide judgment of conviction, dated 22.08.2023

and order of sentence dated 29.12.2023, learned trial

Court has convicted the petitioner, for the offence,

punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable

Instruments Act (hereinafter referred to as the 'NI Act') and

sentenced him to undergo simple imprisonment, for a

period of two months and to pay a fine/compensation of

Rs.1,20,000/­ to the complainant. In default, he has been

ordered to further undergo simple imprisonment for one

month.

4. After dismissal of the appeal by the learned

Appellate Court, the present revision petition has been

preferred.

3 2025:HHC:17174

5. During the pendency of the present petition, the

parties have settled the matter. Thereafter, the petitioner

has filed application bearing Cr.MP No.2252 of 2025, for

permitting the parties to compound the offence, on the

ground that the matter has been settled between the

parties.

6. Statement of both the parties have been

recorded, in which, they both have deposed that the

dispute with regard to Cheque No.720988, dated

15.05.2016, has been settled between the parties.

7. Today, the accused is present before this Court.

He has deposed that he has been convicted and sentenced

by the learned trial Court vide judgment of conviction,

dated 22.08.2023 and order of sentence dated 29.12.2023.

8. Against the said judgment of conviction and

order of sentence, he had filed the appeal before the

learned Appellate Court and the learned Appellate Court

has also dismissed his appeal. Now, he is before this

Court, in the present revision petition.

9. In addition to this, the accused has also

submitted that during the pendency of the revision 4 2025:HHC:17174

petition, the matter has been compromised between him

and the complainant. He has also deposed that he has

deposited a sum of Rs.52,000/­, before the learned trial

Court and paid the remaining amount to the complainant.

10. The petitioner has also deposed that on the

basis of the said compromise, the present petition may

kindly be allowed by setting aside the judgment of

conviction and order of sentence, referred to above, and he

may kindly be acquitted of the charge.

11. Learned counsel for respondent No.1, has also

made the similar statement and has deposed that

respondent No.1, has no objection, in case the present

petition is allowed and the accused is acquitted by setting

aside the judgment of conviction, dated 22.08.2023 and

order of sentence dated 29.12.2023.

12. On the basis of the statements, so made by the

parties, one thing is clear that the matter has been settled

between the parties and in pursuance of the said

settlement, complainant has received the remaining

amount of compensation from the petitioner.

5 2025:HHC:17174

13. According to the respondent­complainant, the

dispute with regard to Cheque No.720988 dated

15.05.2016, has been settled.

14. Since, the matter, with regard to cheque, in

question, has been settled between the parties, as such,

the application, bearing Cr.MP No.2252 of 2025, is allowed

and the parties are permitted to compound the offence.

15. Considering the fact that the application for

compounding of the offence has been allowed, the present

petition is allowed and the judgment of conviction, dated

22.08.2023 and order of sentence dated 29.12.2023,

passed by learned trial Court in Comp. U/s 138 NIA

No.111/2016, which has been affirmed by learned

Appellate Court, in Criminal Appeal No.9 of 2024, vide

judgment dated 20.07.2024, are set aside and the

petitioner is acquitted from the offence, punishable under

Section 138 NI Act. His personal and surety bonds are

discharged.

16. However, this order shall be, subject to deposit

of 10% of the cheque amount, as compounding fee, within

four weeks from today. 50% of the compounding fee be 6 2025:HHC:17174

deposited with the Member Secretary, H.P. State Legal

Services Authority, Shimla, and remaining 50% with the

H.P. High Court Staff Welfare Organization, Shimla.

17. It is further clarified that if the petitioner fails to

deposit the compounding fee, as ordered by this Court,

within four weeks, then, the present petition shall be

deemed to have been dismissed, by reviving the judgment

of conviction, dated 22.08.2023 and order of sentence

dated 29.12.2023, passed by learned trial Court and in

that eventuality, he shall surrender before the learned trial

Court to undergo the substantive sentence, imposed upon

him, by the learned trial Court.

18. The amount deposited by the accused before

the learned trial Court is ordered to be released in favour of

complainant.

19. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any,

shall also stand disposed of.



                                         ( Virender Singh )
June 02, 2025 (ps)                             Judge
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter