Wednesday, 17, Jun, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Pradeep Chand vs State Of Himachal Pradesh & Ors
2025 Latest Caselaw 1630 HP

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 1630 HP
Judgement Date : 8 July, 2025

Himachal Pradesh High Court

Pradeep Chand vs State Of Himachal Pradesh & Ors on 8 July, 2025

Author: Jyotsna Rewal Dua
Bench: Jyotsna Rewal Dua

( 2025:HHC:21740 )

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA

.


                                           CWP No. 9600 of 2025

                                           Decided on: July           08 , 2025





    Pradeep Chand                                                  ...Petitioner

                                    Versus





    State of Himachal Pradesh & Ors.                               ...Respondents

    Coram:

Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge

Whether approved for reporting?

For the petitioner : Mr. K.B. Khajuria, Advocate.

For the respondents : Mr. Rajat Choudhary, Assistant Advocate General for respondents No. 1 & 2.

Mr. Tanuj Thakur, Advocate, for respondent

No. 3.

Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge

Petitioner is serving as Trained Graduate Teacher (Arts) in

respondent - Education Department. He has taken exception to

Office Order dated 02.06.2025 (Annexure P-1) whereby he was

transferred from GMS Naghuien u/c GSSS Parihar (Chamba) to

GMS Naled u/c GSSS Bhalie (Chamba).

Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes.

2 ( 2025:HHC:21740 )

2. The transfer order has been assailed on the ground that

the same, as per petitioner, appears to have been issued on the

.

premise that petitioner had himself requested for his transfer. This

was so in view of the 'remarks column' of the aforesaid Office Order

which did not entitle him to Transfer Travelling Allowance/Joining

Time, whereas, petitioner had never made any request for his

transfer. It was asserted that the impugned transfer order had been

issued to give undue advantage to respondent No. 3 on the basis of

extraneous considerations.

On the basis of the aforesaid ground urged for the

petitioner, operation of impugned order dated 02.06.2025 (Annexure

P-1) was stayed vide order dated 11.06.2025 passed in this writ

petition.

3. During hearing of the case on 03.07.2025, learned Deputy

Advocate General placed on record instructions dated 02.07.2025

from the Director Elementary Education, relevant portion of which

reads as under:-

"In this regard, it is submitted that the petitioner has been transferred as per annexure P-1 as annexed with present petition. The service particulars of the petitioner are as under:-

3 ( 2025:HHC:21740 )

Petitioner [Pradeep Chand, TGT (Arts)]

.

Sr. Date since Previous place Period Distance

No. working in of postings as approximately present TGT school

1. 19.11.2020 GHS, Granger 18.07.2018

u/c GSSS, to Bathri 19.11.2020 (Chamba)

2. GMS, 19.11.2020 07 KMs.

                                      Naghuien u/c      to date
                                      GSSS, Parihar





                                      (Chamba)
                  3.                  Undertransfer                      45 KMs.
                                      to GMS, Nared
                                      u/c     GSSS,
                                      Bhalie
                    r                 (Chamba).

That it is further submitted that the present petitioner had completed his normal tenure at his present place of posting and the petitioner is serving within radius of 07 KMs

since 2018. It is further submitted that the petitioner can represent for granting TTA to the competent authority."

4. The incumbency position of the petitioner indicated in the

office instructions reflects that ever since his promotion as a

Trained Graduate Teacher, petitioner has served only in District

Chamba though as a Trained Graduate Teacher he belongs to the

State cadre. Further, petitioner is serving within a radius of 07 KMs

since 2018. Petitioner, therefore, is liable to be transferred having

completed much more than his normal tenure even at the present

place of posting i.e. GMS Naghuien. Under the impugned order,

4 ( 2025:HHC:21740 )

petitioner has been transferred to a place which is at a distance of

45 KMs from his present place of posting. In terms office

.

instructions, petitioner has not been transferred on the basis of

mutual consent as is presumed by him rather the impugned order is

a normal transfer of the petitioner taking into consideration his

incumbency position. Insofar as petitioner's grievance of having not

been allowed Transfer Travelling Allowance/Joining Time is

concerned, the same can be taken care of by directing respondent

No. 2 to give due & admissible Transfer Travelling Allowance/Joining

time to the petitioner. Ordered accordingly.

For the foregoing reasons, this writ petition is dismissed.

Interim order dated 11.06.2025 is vacated. Pending miscellaneous

application(s), if any, also stand disposed of.

Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge July 08 , 2025 (PK)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter