Thursday, 21, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Cwp No. 11072/2024 vs State Of H.P. & Anr
2025 Latest Caselaw 1522 HP

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 1522 HP
Judgement Date : 4 July, 2025

Himachal Pradesh High Court

Cwp No. 11072/2024 vs State Of H.P. & Anr on 4 July, 2025

Author: Jyotsna Rewal Dua
Bench: Jyotsna Rewal Dua

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA

CWP Nos. 11072 & 11098 of 2024

.

Decided on: 04.07.2025

1. CWP No. 11072/2024

Ravinder Kumar ...Petitioner

Versus

State of H.P. & Anr. ....Respondents.

2. CWP No. 11098/2024

Deepika Kumari & Ors.

                                     to                             ...Petitioners

                                   Versus


    State of H.P. & Ors.                  ....Respondents.


........................................................................................... Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge.

Whether approved for reporting? 1

For the petitioner(s): Mr. Onkar Jairath, Advocate, in both the petitions.

For the respondent(s): Mr. Prashant Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.1, in CWP No. 11072/2024.

Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General with Mr. L.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General for respondent No.2 in CWP No.

1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? yes

11072/2024 and for all the respondents in CWP No.11098/2024.

Jyotsna Rewal Dua , J

.

Even though the reply has not been filed, however, with

the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the matters are heard

at this stage.

2. These writ petitions have been filed for the grant of

almost common substantive reliefs. Relief clause herein is extracted

from CWP No. 11072/2024:-

"a. That this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to issue the Writ in r the nature of Certiorari or any other appropriate writ order or

direction quashing and setting aside the Impugned action of the Respondents, whereby the Regularization of the Petitioner has been delayed unnecessarily and has been regularized on and w.e.f. Order dated 29.09.2022 instead from September 2021,

when the Petitioner completed his two years' service on contractual basis being patently illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional besides the same being in violation to the settled

law of the land.

b) That this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to issue the Writ in the nature of mandamus, order or directions directing the Respondents to regularize the services of the Petitioner w.e.f.

September 2021, when the Petitioner completed his two years' service on contractual basis i.e. from the date the Regularization Policy was liberalized, along with all consequential benefits, including the benefit of Himachal Pradesh Civil Services (Revised pay) Rules, 2022 keeping in view the fact that the Petitioner has completed two years of contract service in the month of September, 2021 i.e. prior to 03.01.2022 as per the Regularization policy dated 28.12.2021 and the petitioner be accorded the benefit of Himachal Pradesh Civil Services Revised pay) Rules, 2022 after

taking into account the services rendered by him on contract basis as having been appointed prior to 03.01.2022, as has been approved by the Cabinet on 14.10.2022.

c) That this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to issue the Writ in

.

the nature of mandamus directing the Respondents to Grant

Higher Stage of Pay in the Concerned Level of Pay Matrix i.e. Rs. 31200/-and fix their pay from due date i.e. after completion two years of regular service with all consequential benefits including

the arrears along with interest @ 9%."

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner(s) submitted that the

issue involved and the reliefs prayed for by the petitioner(s) have

already been adjudicated in Mohit Sharma and Anr. Vs. State of

H.P. and others2. Learned counsel further submitted that the

petitioner(s) would be content, if the cases of the petitioners are

considered by the respondents in light of the aforesaid judgment

within a time bound schedule.

Learned Additional Advocate General has no objection

to this prayer.

4. Having regard to above submissions but without

examining the merits of the matters, these petitions are disposed of

by directing the respondents to consider the cases of the petitioners

in light of the aforesaid judgment and pass appropriate order in

accordance with law within a period of six weeks from the date of

receipt of copy of this order. The decision so arrived at, shall be

communicated to the petitioner(s).

2CWP No. 1638 of 2024, decided on 29.11.2024

Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also to

stand disposed of.

.


                                                       Jyotsna Rewal Dua
                                                             Judge
    4th July, 2025(rohit)





                    r          to










 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter