Wednesday, 20, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Surinder Chauhan And Another vs State Of Himachal Pradesh And Others
2025 Latest Caselaw 4167 HP

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 4167 HP
Judgement Date : 25 February, 2025

Himachal Pradesh High Court

Surinder Chauhan And Another vs State Of Himachal Pradesh And Others on 25 February, 2025

Author: Ajay Mohan Goel
Bench: Ajay Mohan Goel
    IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA

                      CWP No.13980 of 2024
                      Decided on: 25.02.2025
Surinder Chauhan and another                                               ... Petitioners
                             Versus

State of Himachal Pradesh and others                                    ... Respondents

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge.

Whether approved for reporting?1
____________________________________________________
For the petitioners   :     Mr. Shrawan Dogra and Mr. B.M
                            Chauhan, Senior Advocates, with Mr.
                            Abhishek Thakur, Advocate.

For the respondents             :        Mr. Pushpinder Jaswal,                    Additional
                                         Advocate General.

Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral)

By way of this writ petition, the petitioners have prayed

for the following reliefs:-

a) "That writ of mandamus may be issued against the respondent No.2, directing to construct the ambulance road from point A to B as shown in the Annexure P-1 from Kiari to lower Bhuila through Khasra Nos. 134/1, 130, 132, 123, 126, 142, 130, 140, 145, 150, 133 and 175 situated at up-mohal Ganni, Tehsil Kotkhai, District Shimla, H.P.

b) Direction may be issued to the respondents No.1 to 4 to persuade the respondent No.5 to 8 to surrender their encroachment over the public path bearing Khasra Nos. 134/1, 130, 132, 123 situated at up-mohal Ganni, Tehsil Kotkhai, District Shimla, H.P. for the construction of ambulance road in the interest of parties herein, failing which direction be issued to initiate the encroachment proceedings on day-to-day basis."

1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?

2. When the case was listed before the Court on

09.01.2025, the following order was passed:-

"Pursuant to order dated 29.11.2024, learned Additional Advocate General has placed on record communication dated 7.1.2025, issued under the signature of Deputy Commissioner, Shimla, District Shimla, Himachal Pradesh, perusal whereof reveals that total length of proposed road is 500 meters and width of the same is 1 meter. Though in revenue record, path has been shown to be of 3 meters but same has been encroached by the local people. Sub Divisional Officer (Civil) Kotkhai vide letter dated 7.1.2025, addressed to Deputy Commissioner, Shimla has reported that as per report of Tehsildar, Kotkhai, spot demarcation of Khasra Nos. 123, 132, 134/1 and 139, kita-04 area measuring 0-06-02 hectare was conducted on 1.1.2025 by the Field Kanungo and Halqa Patwari and it was found that Khasra Nos. 123, 132 and 139, kita 03 are in the ownership of government and have not been encroached. However, on Khasra No. 134/1, which is also government land, encroachment has been found to be made by Sh. Naresh, S/o Mela Ram, R/o Village Bagain Jubber, P.O. Ghaleya, who has constructed a house. After having detected encroachment on the Government land, action already stands initiated against the encroacher under Section 163 of H.P. Land Revenue Act 1954. Though perusal of aforesaid instructions reveals that save and except, encroachment made by person namely Naresh, there is no other impediment in construction of ambulance road, but learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioner states that before passing further order, one opportunity may be granted to the petitioner to verify the factual position on the spot and persuade the encroacher to remove the encroachment immediately so that no further delay is caused in construction of the ambulance road. Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for and is granted four weeks' time to have instructions.

List on 25.2.2025."

3. Today, learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner on

instructions submits that Mr. Naresh S/o Mela Ram, R/o village

Bagain Jubber, P.O. Ghaleya, has been persuaded to remove the

encroachment so that the ambulance road can be constructed and

he has assured that the encroachment shall be removed by him.

Learned Senior Counsel further submits that in the light of the said

development, interest of justice would be served in case this

petition is disposed of with the direction that now let the

construction of ambulance road be completed by the Authorities as

expeditiously as possible.

4. In the light of the said developments this writ petition is

disposed of with the direction that immediately after the removal of

the encroachment by Sh. Naresh let the construction/completion

work of the ambulance road be immediately taken up, expeditiously

and completed within a period of three months thereafter. Pending

miscellaneous application(s), if any also stand disposed of

accordingly.

(Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge February 25, 2025 (Vinod)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter