Wednesday, 20, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Cwp No. 2392/2023 vs Of
2025 Latest Caselaw 9783 HP

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 9783 HP
Judgement Date : 2 December, 2025

[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Himachal Pradesh High Court

Cwp No. 2392/2023 vs Of on 2 December, 2025

Author: Jyotsna Rewal Dua
Bench: Jyotsna Rewal Dua
          IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH,
                         SHIMLA


                             CWP No. 2392/2023 a/w connected matters




                                                                     .
                                           Decided on: 02.12.2025





    1.     CWP No. 2392/2023

     Uttam Chand                                                  ...Petitioner





                                  Versus




                                           of
     H.P. Agro Industries Corporation Limited & Ors.
                                                                   ....Respondents.
     2.    CWP No.2394/2023

     Kishori Lal  rt                                                      ...Petitioner
                                  Versus

     H.P. Agro Industries Corporation Limited & Ors.

                                                                  ....Respondents.
     3.    CWP No. 2396/2023

     Ranjeet Singh                                                ...Petitioner


                                  Versus

     H.P. Agro Industries Corporation Limited & Ors.
                                                 ....Respondents.




     4.    CWP No. 2398/2023





     Kartar Singh                                                 ...Petitioner
                                  Versus

     H.P. Agro Industries Corporation Limited & Ors.





                                                  ....Respondents.
     ........................................................................................
     Coram
     Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge.
     Whether approved for reporting? 1




     1      Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? yes




                                                    ::: Downloaded on - 06/12/2025 00:02:34 :::CIS
                                 2



    For the petitioner(s):          Mr. Vijay Chaudhary and Mr. Vijay
                                    Mokta, Advocates, in all the
                                    petitions.

     For the respondent(s):         Mr. Anil Thakur, Advocate for




                                                              .
                                    respondents No.1 & 2 in all the





                                    petitions.

                                    Mr. Rahul Mahajan, Advocate for
                                    respondent No.3 in all the





                                    petitions.

                                    Mr. Rajat Choudhary, Assistant




                                       of
                                    Advocate General, for respondent
                                    No.4 in all the petitions.

                                    Mr. Suresh Chauhan, SSO from the
                 rt                 office of RPFC, present in person.

    Jyotsna Rewal Dua, J.

The only surviving dispute between the parties pertains

to the release of Employees' Family Pension Fund Contributions

deposited by the petitioners (employees) as well as by respondent

Nos.1 and 2 (employers).

2. Learned counsel for respondent No.3-Regional

Provident Fund Commissioner, Shimla has placed on record office

instructions dated 01.12.2025 and submits that respondent No.3 has

not yet released the Employees' Family Pension Fund Contributions

made both by the petitioners and their employers in favour of the

petitioners, as the petitioners have not yet submitted applications for

withdrawal of the Family Pension Scheme contributions in Form

No.10-C under the Employees' Family Pension Scheme, 1971.

Learned counsel further submits that within two weeks from the date

the petitioners applying for withdrawal of the Family Pension Fund

Contributions, the amount due and admissible shall be released into

.

their respective bank accounts in terms of the Employees' Family

Pension Scheme, 1971.

3. At the request of learned counsel for the petitioners,

learned counsel for respondent No.3 has assured that a copy of Form

of No.10-C will be supplied during the course of the day, to enable the

petitioners to submit the aforesaid applications in accordance with

law.

rt

4. In view of the above, these writ petitions are disposed of

with liberty reserved to the petitioners to apply for release of the

Employees' Family Pension Fund Contributions (employees' and

employers' share) in Form No.10-C, as per the Employees' Family

Pension Scheme, 1971, through respondent No. 1 & 2 to respondent

No.3. Upon submission of such applications, respondent No.3 shall,

within two weeks thereafter, release the amount due and admissible

to each of the petitioners by remitting the same into their bank

accounts, details of which shall be furnished by the petitioners along

with Form No.10-C. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any,

shall also stand disposed of.

Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge 2nd December, 2025(rohit)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter