Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 13969 HP
Judgement Date : 17 September, 2024
2024:HHC:8674
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT
SHIMLA
CWP No. 10267 of 2024
Decided on : 17.09.2024
.
Des Raj
...Petitioner
Versus
The Executive Director (Personnel) Vidyut Bhawan and
another.
...Respondents
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge
Whether approved for reporting? 1
r to
For the petitioner : Mr. Tek Chand, Advocate.
For the respondents : Ms. Sunita Sharma, Senior
Advocate, with Mr. Dhananjay
Sharma, Advocate.
Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral)
Issue notice. Mr. Dhananjay Sharma, learned
Counsel, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents.
2. At this stage, learned Counsel for the petitioner
submits that interest of justice would be served in case the
petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to file a
detailed representation with further direction to the respondents
1Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2024:HHC:8674
to decide the representation of the petitioner, as expeditiously
as possible.
3. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of with the
.
direction that in the event of the petitioner filing a detailed
representation, with regard to the issues raised in the writ
petition, within a period of one week from today, let the same
be decided sympathetically, within a period of 4 weeks' as from
the date of receipt thereof and in terms of the averments
contained therein. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any,
also stand disposed of.
(Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge
September 17, 2024 (Shivank Thakur)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!