Thursday, 21, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Date Of Decision: 11.09.2024 vs Hari Ram
2024 Latest Caselaw 13684 HP

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 13684 HP
Judgement Date : 11 September, 2024

Himachal Pradesh High Court

Date Of Decision: 11.09.2024 vs Hari Ram on 11 September, 2024

Author: Sandeep Sharma

Bench: Sandeep Sharma

2024:HHC:8347

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA

Criminal Revision No.219 of 2024 Date of Decision: 11.09.2024

.

_______________________________________________________

Smt. Lachhmi Devi and others .......Petitioners

Versus

Hari Ram ... Respondent _______________________________________________________ Coram:

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? 1.

For the Petitioners:

For the Respondent: Mr. L.S. Mehta, Advocate.

r to Mr. Subhash Chander, Advocate.

_______________________________________________________

Sandeep Sharma, Judge(oral):

By way of instant Criminal Revision Petition filed under

Section 19(4) of the Family Courts Act read with Section 401 of the

Code of Criminal Procedure, challenge has been laid to order dated

06.12.2023 passed by learned Additional Principal Judge, Family

Court, Sundernagar, District Mandi, Himachal Pradesh, whereby

Court concerned, while allowing the petition filed by the petitioners

under Section 125 Cr.P.C, proceeded to award interim maintenance

to the tune of Rs. 4000/- per month to petitioner No.1 and Rs. 2000/-

each to petitioner Nos. 2 to 4 , petitioners have approached this Court

in the instant proceedings, praying therein to modify aforesaid order

and enhance the interim maintenance.

Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?

2024:HHC:8347

2. Having regard to the nature of the dispute and

relationship interse parties, this Court before considering the case on

.

its own merit, deemed it necessary to explore possibility of amicable

settlement interse parties and as such, called upon both the parties to

come present before this Court. On 25.7.2024, parties came present

before this Court. Though, on afore date, respondent was ready and

willing to take the petitioner-wife as well as her children back to their

home, but since petitioner-wife wanted to consult her parents, matter

was adjourned for today's date.

3. It is heartening to note that parties have been able to

settle their dispute amicably interse them, whereby they have agreed

to live together from today.

4. During the proceedings of the case, learned counsel

representing the parties have placed on record compromise deed

dated 4.9.2024, arrived interse parties, which is made part of the

record. As per aforesaid compromise, both the parties have agreed to

live peacefully and happily and they have also decided to withdraw all

the cases, be it criminal or civil, having been filed by them against

each other. Amount of interim maintenance awarded by Court below

has been also deposited in the bank account of the petitioner-wife.

Respondent-husband has undertaken not to maltreat and harass the

petitioner-wife as well as his children in future.

2024:HHC:8347

5. Both the petitioner-wife and respondent-husband, who

are present in Court, state on oath before this Court that they of their

.

own volition and without there being any external pressure have

entered into the compromise, whereby they have resolved to settle

their dispute amicably interse them. They state that as per the

compromise, they have decided to live together and all the cases filed

by them against each other shall be withdrawn immediately. They

further state that in the event of any default on their part to abide by

the terms and conditions of the compromise, they would render

themselves liable for penal consequence as well as contempt of the

Court. While admitting the contents of the compromise deed placed

on record to be correct, they also admit their signatures upon the

same. Their statements are taken on record.

6. Consequently, in view of the aforesaid settlement arrived

Interse parties nothing remains to be adjudicated in the present

petition and accordingly same is disposed of. Order dated 06.12.2023

passed by learned Additional Principal Judge, Family Court,

Sundernagar, District Mandi, Himachal Pradesh is quashed and set

aside. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of.

(Sandeep Sharma), Judge September 11, 2024 (shankar)

2024:HHC:8347

.

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter