Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 13291 HP
Judgement Date : 6 September, 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA.
CWP No. 9448 of 2024
Decided on:06.09.2024
____________________________________________________
Sindhu Sharma
........... petitioner
.
Versus
State of H.P. and another respondents
____________________________________________________
Coram:
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Bipin Chander Negi, Judge
Whether approved for reporting? 1
For the petitioner : Mr. Tarun K. Sharma, Advocate.
For the respondents :
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional
Advocate General.
____________________________________________________
Bipin Chander Negi, Judge (oral)
Notice. Mr. B.N. Sharma, learned Additional
Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on
behalf of the respondents.
2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the
petitioners submits that with respect to the grievances being
raised in the present petition, same are squarely covered by the
judgment delivered by this Court in CWP No. 2004 of 2017 titled
as Taj Mohammad and others vs. The State of H.P. and
others alongwith connected matter, decided on 03.08.2023.
3. Other than the aforesaid, learned counsel appearing
on behalf of the petitioners submits that an appropriate
representation stands made by the petitioners to the concerned
Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
quarter. The representation so made is appended alongwith the
present petition as Annexure P-3 and is dated 04.08.2024.
5. Learned Additional Advocate General submits that
the same shall be decided within a period of eight weeks from
.
today.
6. In view thereof, the present petition is disposed of, so
also, pending miscellaneous application, if any.
List for compliance on 30.12.2024.
(Bipin Chander Negi) Judge
September 06, 2024 tarun
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!